|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, May 12, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Babri case: U.P. Opposition in a fix
By J.P. Shukla
LUCKNOW, MAY 11. The decision of the special CBI court at Lucknow
to put on hold the trial of the BJP leaders in the Babri Masjid
demolition case has placed the opposition parties in Uttar
Pradesh in a dilemma.
The parties want to pin down the BJP-led State Government, but
find themselves unable to arouse public opinion effectively. The
technical flaw in the notification issued to refer the case to
the special court has provided an opportunity to the BJP to
pronounce that its leaders were innocent, despite the CBI having
found sufficient ground to file chargesheet against them.
What proved worse for the opposition was the difference of
opinion over fixing responsibility for the issuance of the flawed
notification that was subsequently struck down by the Allahabad
High Court. When the case was handed over to the CBI, Uttar
Pradesh was under President's rule.
The Bahujan Samaj Party leader, Ms. Mayawati, while demanding
that a rectified notification be issued to facilitate the trial
of the accused, including the Union Ministers, Mr. L.K. Advani,
Mr. Murli Manohar Joshi and Ms. Uma Bharati, criticised the
Congress for conniving with the BJP. She said that the then State
Government had deliberately issued a defective notification to
help the accused BJP leaders. The Samajwadi Party and the
Congress have been vociferously demanding a fresh notification to
take the trial to its logical end, but have gone soft on the
persons responsible for issuing the notification. The Congress
particularly finds it difficult to explain how the flaw had been
allowed to creep in and who was responsible.
The situation has come as a much sought after respite for the BJP
whose leaders have claimed that the way the defective
notification was issued amply proved that the then Congress
Government was in undue hurry to implicate the BJP leaders. It
did not have scruple to examine the legal implications of the
notification and wanted to punish the top BJP leaders by any
means.
Now as the State Government has rejected the demand for a fresh
notification, the opposition feels cheated. There is little way
for it to force the Government to issue a fresh notification. The
State BJP president, Mr. Kalraj Mishra, has taken the position
that in his opinion his party leaders were innocent and that
there was no ground to prosecute them. The question to issue a
fresh notification thus did not arise. The Allahabad High Court,
while striking down the proceedings against the accused in the
special court on the ground that these were based on a flawed
notification, held that a cured notification could be issued. The
Court did not give any directive that it was obligatory on the
part of the Government to issue such a notification. The State
Government volunteering to issue a corrected notification was
thus out of question.
To support its cause, the BJP leaders have cited the then
Congress Government decision to withdraw various cases filed in
courts against its leaders on the basis of the Shah Commission
report. Even in Uttar Pradesh, judicial commissions of enquiry
had been constituted to enquire into excesses committed during
the emergency. In many instances, culprits had been pin-pointed
and recommendations made for their prosecution. When the Congress
returned to power in 1980, it rejected all commission reports.
Not a single person was prosecuted or convicted for the excesses.
In West Bengal, in the successive waves of Naxalite movements,
1967 onwards, cases were filed against Marxists for their
involvement in crimes including murders and dacoities. Some of
those involved were even convicted and awarded prison terms. When
the Leftist government returned to power, cases were not only
withdrawn but even those convicted and undergoing prison terms
were pardoned, said Mr. Mishra.
Politically, thus, the Opposition finds itself on a weak turf
while attempting to pin down the BJP. The CBI still has the
option to appeal in the Supreme Court against the order. Whether
the apex court would reverse the High Court order is doubtful.
The CBI counsel has already put on record that it was not for the
prosecuting agency to dictate to the State Government to issue a
fresh notification. Some Muslim organisations have been talking
of filing writ of mandamus seeking court directives to the State
Government, but the possibility of their getting favourable
orders from the Court was remote, legal experts said.
LUCKNOW, MAY 11. The Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, Mr. Rajnath
Singh, today said the Government would not issue fresh
notification in the Ayodhya demolition case unless the court
ordered it.
In an informal chat with presspersons, he said the State
Government would follow the directions of the court in issuing a
fresh notification. ``The State Government would take a decision
which is in concurrence with law and justice''.
This is the first such assertion of the Chief Minister after the
issue rocked the proceedings of the Vidhan Sabha for two
consecutive days. The Opposition demanded a fresh notification
alleging that the State Government was deliberately delaying it
to protect the guilty, including three Union Ministers.
- UNI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Rs. 400 cr. given to States for drought relief Next : Rapid HIV detection kit launched | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|