|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Making their own laws
Witnesses turning hostile, doctored evidence, fictitious
alibis... These have come to plague the criminal justice system,
making it putty in the hands of the rich and famous, writes Anita
Joshua.
WITNESSES TURNING hostile, doctored evidence, fictitious alibis.
They are all staple ingredients of Bollywood pot-boilers. Have
been for quite a while. Today, this masala of reel-life courtroom
dramas has come to plague the criminal justice system of the
country, making it putty in the hands of the rich and famous.
And, it's all out in the open. There was nothing clandestine in
the manner in which Shyan Munshi - an eyewitness for the
prosecution in the Jessica Lal case - resiled from his police
statement on May 3 this year. It was no different when three
eyewitnesses - one of whom had offered to stand witness - in the
BMW case turned hostile.
In both cases, a measure introduced by the Legislature to speed
up the criminal justice system made it easy for the eyewitnesses
to do a volte face. ``We need to go back to the pre-1973 system
where statements had to be recorded before a magistrate in which
case the witnesses found it difficult to resile for fear of
prosecution,'' says the seasoned lawyer, Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi. In his
opinion, cutting corners has not paid the desired dividends but
has, instead, facilitated corruption. ``It is a low risk, high
profit business.'' Recording of statements by the police without
even witness' signature has made it easy and, often, profitable
for eyewitnesses to later disown them.
In fact, efforts to derail the process begin much earlier. In
both the BMW case and the Jessica Lal case - the prime accused
being the grandson of a former Chief of the Naval Staff, and the
son of a former Union Minister respectively - efforts were made
to tamper with the evidence. Further, in the Jessica Lal case,
and the black buck case involving Salman Khan in Jodhpur, the
investigation process was also sought to be influenced. While
some measure of success was achieved in the former with the
transfer of the key investigator and Station House Officer a
little over a fortnight after the murder, the bid to remove the
Investigating Officer in the Black Buck case was aborted.
Mr. Ashok Kumar, a trustee of Wildlife Trust of India, says
attempts were made to weaken the case against Salman Khan and his
co-stars by doctoring the crucial post-mortem examination report.
``The veterinary doctor attributed the death of one of the
animals to `asphyxia caused by overeating' and another to canines
killing it after it fell into an open ditch.'' Suspecting foul
play, forest officials suspended the vet, set up a medical board,
exhumed the bodies, and conducted a second post-mortem
examination in which gun-shot wounds were detected.
What makes environmentalists particularly optimistic about a
conviction in this case is the attitude of the Bishnois. Key
witnesses to the hunting of black buck by the stars, the Bishnois
- who revere the animal - are one with the prosecution on this
case. Still, leaving no stone unturned, the prosecution got the
statements of the Bishnois recorded in front of a magistrate to
ensure that there is no going back.
For now, everything seems to be going in favour of the
prosecution in the black buck case. But, it has taken the
prosecution two- and-a-half years to get here and judgment day is
still not in sight. And, it is because of such delay - partly due
to shortage of judges - that the criminal justice system gets
defeated.
``The delay can be harassing for the witnesses which, in turn,
makes them more vulnerable to pressure tactics,'' rues Mr. Tulsi
who attributes much of the ills that plague the criminal justice
system and the low conviction rate to the state. ``It is
neglecting the criminal justice system; thereby reducing the fear
of the law among people. Fear of the law will not be instilled in
the minds of law-breakers - particularly, the resourceful -
without quick retribution.''
Though it is still early days in the Fardeen Khan case, eyebrows
have been raised over the manner in which the Narcotics Control
Bureau (NCB) did a complete turnaround in 24 hours. While
arresting the actor, NCB officials had said that they had found
nine grams of cocaine on him. A day later, they were singing
another tune; telling a special judge that not a single gram of
the drug was found on the actor.
If the real-life courtroom dramas mirror commercial cinema, the
situation behind bars is no different from that depicted on
celluloid when the high and mighty have to serve time. The
capital's Tihar Central Jail - Asia's largest prison complex - is
no exception. Jail officials admit that the law is loaded in
favour of the guilty, and the rich among them - by virtue of
being able to hire the best legal minds - normally get themselves
released rather quickly. This is reflected in the profile of
prisoners. Only a handful of the prisoners here are from rich
families, though the bratpack involvement in criminal acts is
increasing by the day.
Even among them, it is only those involved in sensational cases,
such as Sanjeev Nanda and Manu Sharma, who are unable to get out
easily; primarily, because of public attention. Still, each had
independent cells. Most rich prisoners manage to get several
concessions from jail authorities which allow them many of the
comforts of their home in prison.
Then there are the likes of Subhash Gupta, prime accused in the
Personal Point triple murder case, who spent much of his time
behind bars in hospital where he managed to get a room to
himself. ``Similarly, Sushil Ansal - among the main accused in
the Uphaar fire - spent his time in prison shunting between Tihar
and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences'', recalls Ms.
Neelam Krishnamurty, mother of two children killed in the fire
and the driving force of the Association of the Victims of Uphaar
Tragedy (AVUT).
Given the pace at which the case has been proceeding and the fact
that there are as many as 170 witnesses, the fear of many an AVUT
member is that they might not live to see judgment day.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Now, a charisma count Next : Weavers - woes loom still | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|