|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Bill on Panchayat Act deferred
By Gargi Parsai
NEW DELHI, MAY 19. The Centre today decided to defer the 87th
Constitution Amendment Bill empowering States to choose the mode
of election of chairpersons and members at the block and district
panchayat levels, after an all-party meeting here failed to reach
a consensus. It was decided to refer the issues raised in the
proposed Bill to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural
and Urban Development for a ``comprehensive'' legislation to
strengthen grassroots bodies.
The meeting was convened by the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari
Vajpayee, to evolve a consensus on the Bill introduced in the
Rajya Sabha in 1999 following a demand from the Andhra Pradesh
Legislative Assembly. He chaired the two-and-a- half-hour meeting
at the end of which it was decided to call another all-party
meeting to review the situation.
Representatives from 18 parties attended the meeting. The AIDMK,
the PMK and the Trinamool Congress stayed away.
An immediate fallout of the decision taken today is that the
Andhra Pradesh Government, which has been stalling elections to
panchayats on the basis of its proposed 87th Amendment Bill for
more than a year now, will have to hold elections before July 31,
the date stipulated by the Supreme Court. Other States and Union
Territories which are yet to hold elections under the Panchayat
Raj Act are Assam, Pondicherry, Punjab (to two tiers), Gujarat
(to the gram sabha) and the newly- formed States.
``The re-establishment of genuine local self-government has
helped improve governance, increased people's participation in
development and strengthened our democracy. This Bill should be
deferred as it affects the basic structure of Constitution with
regard to local bodies,'' the Prime Minister said. The most
vociferous defence of the proposed amendment came from the leader
of the TDP in the Lok Sabha, Mr K. Yerran Naidu, who stated the
State's stand on the issue and said it would bring about organic
linkages between the three tiers. The TDP found support in the
Samajwadi Party, the Akali Dal, the INLD, the DMK and the
MGRADMK.
Speaking for the Congress, Mr. Mani Shankar Aiyer strongly
opposed the Bill and said that leaving it free to the States
would bring about distortion in the uniform pattern envisaged and
in the degree of democratic representation.The CPI(M), the CPI,
the RSP, the NSP, the JMM, the Kerala Congress, the Biju Janata
Dal and the JD(U) opposed the Bill.
The Union Minister for Rural Development, Mr. Venkaiah Naidu,
said most parties focussed on why devolution of power and funds
to the people had not taken place and why District Planning
Committee had not been set up under the 73rd and 74th
Constitution amendments. And this is what the Standing Committee
would go into.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Pitch in, Shabir tells Musharraf Next : Return to NDA, MPs tell Mamata | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|