|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, June 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Confirm or face contempt case, AP told
By Our Staff Reporter
BANGALORE, JUNE 2. The Minister for Major and Medium Irrigation,
Mr. H. K. Patil, said here on Saturday that the State Government
would file a contempt of court petition in the Supreme Court next
week against the Andhra Pradesh Government, if it did not give
official confirmation about the stoppage of the work on feeder
canals near Honnagondana Halli in Sira taluk.
Mr. Patil, who attended a meeting of senior Supreme Court
advocates, technical experts and senior officers to discuss the
issue, said the State Government would not go by the reports in
newspapers about the statement of the Andhra Pradesh Minister for
Irrigation, Mr. Venkateshwar Rao, that the work had been stopped.
The work was started on March 17, and from Siddappanakatte to
Byadageri in that State, the proposed canal- way had been dug up.
Mr. Rao made a similar statement in Delhi recently, but the work
was later continued. The Karnataka Government would accept only
an official confirmation sent through a committee comprising
``responsible'' people of that Government.
Asked what the Government would do if Andhra Pradesh did not make
such a response, he said that Karnataka Government would file a
contempt of court case next week, as decided at the all-party
meeting chaired by the Chief Minister, Mr. S. M. Krishna.
Referring to the Union Water Resources Minister's reply to Mr.
Krishna's complaint against the Andhra Pradesh Government, Mr.
Patil said the former had advised the State to solve the issue
bilaterally.
Taking serious objection to the suggestion, Mr. Patil said that
it was nothing but shirking of responsibility by the Centre. The
complaint was made for violating the Bachawat Award and the
Supreme Court direction, and it was not a bilateral issue that
could be solved by the two governments.
Condemning the Centre for its ``failure'' to intervene in the
matter and restrain Andhra Pradesh, Mr. Patil said that Karnataka
had followed what it could do in a federal system, when another
State resorted to ``mischief'' in sharing of river waters. He
said the Tumkur Deputy Commissioner had sent reports that the
work was not resumed.
Asked whether there was any motive behind the Union Minister's
suggestion that the issue be solved bilaterally, since the Telugu
Desam Party supported the National Democractic Alliance, Mr.
Patil parried the question and said that Karnataka would warn the
Centre, if it failed to protect its interests. The State
Government would make it a party in the case, he added.
When his attention was drawn to the charge made by Mr. P. G. R.
Sindhia, Janata Dal(U) leader in the Assembly, on the reported
complaint by the Tamil Nadu Government against desilting of tanks
under the Jala Samvardhane Programme, and the Centre`s circular
restraining the State from doing it, the minister said that he
had asked the officers concerned to verify this.
Mr. Sindhia had said that the Tamil Nadu Government had taken
objection to the work for which the State had approached the
World Bank for a Rs. 1,000-crore loan.
Mr. Patil thanked the Maharashtra Chief Minister, Mr. Vilasrao
Deshmukh, for releasing water from the Ujani and Varana dams
across the Bheema and the Krishna respectively to meet the
drinking water needs of the villages in Gulbarga and Bijapur
districts.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Cong. demands white paper on Govt. spending Next : KSRTC bus terminus on Mysore Road | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|