|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, June 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Truce extension draws flak
By Vinay Kumar
NEW DELHI, JUNE 15. The extension of the four-year-old ceasefire
with the NSCN (I-M) for another year without territorial limits
in Naga inhabited areas in the north-east has evoked sharp
criticism from political parties in Assam and Manipur, which have
blamed the Centre for rushing through it without consulting them.
The reactions, particularly in Assam and Manipur, may be
``initial after-shocks'' but in view of the apprehensions over
the territorial integrity of the States and the emotional issues
involved in the entire north-east, the Centre has to watch its
steps.
It's assurance on upholding the territorial integrity of these
States appears to have fallen on deaf ears.
So sharp was the reaction in Manipur, now under President's rule,
that the Governor, Mr. Ved Marwah, spoke to the Union Home
Minister, Mr. L.K. Advani, this morning and conveyed to him the
``strong feelings of the people of Manipur and their fears''.
Advani's assurance
Mr. Advani assured the Governor that there was no question of
agreeing to anything that would in any way threaten Manipur's
territorial integrity. He also told the Governor that the
National Democratic Alliance (NDA), as laid down in its Common
Minimum Programme, was committed to maintaining Manipur's
territorial integrity and other north-eastern States and it would
honour that commitment.
Reiterating the Government's policy to welcome the insurgent
groups to cease violent activities and come to the negotiating
table for a peaceful and just solution to all their problems and
aspirations, Mr. Marwah appealed to the insurgent groups
operating in Manipur to eschew violence and join the process of
dialogue.
The Home Secretary, Mr. Kamal Pande, yesterday wrote to the Chief
Secretary of Manipur. ``Though, this time, the ceasefire is
without any territorial limits and not limited to Nagaland, I
wish to assure you that this decision would not, in any way,
affect the territorial integrity of any of the north-eastern
States,'' Mr. Pande said.
Analysts pointed out that the north-eastern States are dreading
that the NSCN(I-M) would someday rake up the demand for a
``Greater Nagaland'' and might use the ceasefire expansion beyond
Nagaland to lend an air of legitimacy to their demand.
The agreement, reached between the Government's representative,
Mr. K. Padmanabhaiah and the NSCN(I-M) leadership, Mr. T. Muivah
and Mr. Isaak Chisi Swu, at Bangkok after parleys on June 13-14,
talks of the agreement between ``two entities'', without
mentioning any territory.
The extension without territorial limits is being seen as a major
concession which the NSCN (I-M) has been able to derive from the
Centre. North-east watchers feel that it would give a better
bargaining power to the outfit as it would be able to project
itself as almost the sole player in Nagaland before talks on
substantive political issues begin.
Though the three States -- Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh
-- have in the recent past come round the view that extension of
the ceasefire with the NSCN(I-M) would help reduce tension and
conflict in the region, their reactions are also bound to be
shaped by political considerations in the region.
The Home Ministry sources said that the Naga-inhabited areas in
Assam were North Cachar and Karbi Anglong; in Arunachal Pradesh,
the Naga population was concentrated in Tirap and Changlang
districts and, in Manipur, in Ukhrool and Senapati. The
Government extracted an assurance from the NSCN(I-M) leadership
that the outfit would not support other insurgent groups in the
region such as the ULFA and the Bodo groups.
As the next round of talks is scheduled in the first week of
August, the Centre would literally be walking on the razor's edge
to build opinion in favour of the extension of the truce with the
NSCN(I-M). The reasoning would be that it makes little sense to
observe the ceasefire only in Nagaland and keep fighting in the
other States. At the same time, the Government would need to keep
vigil on the security scenario in the other neighbouring States
in order to push forward the peace process.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Musharraf hopes to 'change course of history' Next : Red alert in Manipur | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|