|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, June 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
HC notice to CBI official
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, JUNE 15.
The Delhi High Court today issued notices to two officials,
including a Joint Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation
(CBI), on a petition by an accused seeking registration of a case
of criminal intimidation and wrongful confinement against them.
A Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice S.K. Mahajan and Mr.
Justice A.K. Sikri asked the two officials as well as the Delhi
Government to file replies to the petition by June 20.
According to the petition filed through Mr. Surender Miglani, an
advocate, Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, brother of Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,
former Deputy Director of the Enforcement Directorate, Delhi
Zone, was summoned by Inspector Vinod Kumar Pandey for June 7.
When the petitioner, facing prosecution in a disproportionate
assets case along with his brother, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, appeared
before the investigating agency, no interrogation was conducted,
the petition said.
Mr. Vijay Aggarwal was again summoned for June 11. Meanwhile, a
Special Judge for CBI cases here issued notice on June 8 to the
Joint Director, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, and Deputy Superintendent of
Police (DSP), Mr. Ramneesh, on an application by Mr. Ashok
Aggarwal accusing them of forging an Interpol fax message from
Singapore to oppose his bail in the disproportionate assets case
last year, the petition said.
When Mr. Vijay Aggarwal appeared at the CBI headquarters on June
11, the Inspector, at the behest of the Joint Director,
humiliated and directed him to ask his brother to withdraw the
application from the lower court, the petition alleged.
Mr. Miglani submitted that the summoning of his client was in
violation of a lower court direction of last year asking the CBI
not to summon the accused without its prior permission.
He submitted that the act of the two officials amounted to
criminally intimidating and wrongfully confining his client.
Meanwhile, the High Court asked the CBI to adhere to the lower
court's direction and not to summon Mr. Vijay Aggarwal without
its prior permission.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Water quality upto standard Next : CM hits out at Yatra politics | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|