|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, June 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
White Paper: strong medicine for hard times
By Roy Mathew
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JUNE 19. Eminently worthy of implementation.
This can be said about most of the proposals in the White Paper
on State Finances released on Monday. However, sustained
political will would be required if the proposals are to be
carried through.
The state of the finances is not as alarming as it is made out
to be. (This is subjective. The point is that it is still within
manageable limits). What is alarming is the fact that the LDF
chose to turn a blind eye when matters began to worsen in 1998,
and that there is intense resistance to some of the proposals in
the UDF Government itself. More alarming is the state of affairs
of the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB).
The Paper treats Government employees with kid gloves though
much of the trouble had begun with the pay revision. There is no
proposal for a freeze on salaries. Though a minimum of 10 per
cent of the basic pay is proposed to be impounded in Provident
Fund or Treasury Savings, an additional interest of 0.5 per cent
is added as a sop. Besides, the pension age is proposed to be
raised to 56. The redeployment and retraining proposed is not
drastic, at least, for the time being.
The employees may gripe over the proposal to limit medical
reimbursements to emergencies. However, it is to be noted that
there used to be some false claims over minor illnesses and
treatment in Government hospitals is still free.
Appointments to Government services and aided schools would be
nearly frozen owing to the proposal to raise the pension age,
abolition of posts that were vacant for over a year, closure of
uneconomic schools and redeployment of protected teachers. The
cost of education in colleges would inevitably go up. Employment
has to be created elsewhere to offset the fall in employment
opportunities.
A sum of Rs.750 crores is proposed to be collected through tax
revenue augmentation. The success of the measures proposed will
depend entirely upon the political will that the Government can
muster. How far the Chief Minister, Mr. A.K. Antony, can keep his
Government free of corruption is also crucial to this. Words like
rationalisation and simplification of tax structure were concepts
that had been repeatedly stated in the LDF Government's
successive budgets. But things did not work out in the absence of
political will and clear direction. The LDF Government did not
have the will to implement the proposals on
non tax revenue. Many of these were recommended by the Committee
on Non-tax Revenues in 1999.
The proposals for revision of rents on Government leases had
been hanging fire for over two decades. Successive Governments
failed to enforce the law passed by the Assembly in this respect
in 1980. An amendment to the Act passed a few years ago is still
waiting clearance by the Centre. There is no sound reason for the
delay except that vested interests are at work. The measure is
estimated to fetch as much as Rs. 175 crores.
The proposal to harvest more windfallen trees for an additional
Rs. 50 crores is fraught with danger. When trees are dragged out
of interior forests, the process causes considerable damage to
the undergrowth. It is not a secret that standing trees are
felled in the name of windfallen trees by contractors. More trees
fall when forest tracts get opened up. If revenues from fallen
trees go up, it means more and more forests are getting denuded.
A better option would be to take measures to improve returns
from forest plantations. The functions of the Forest Department
regarding maintenance of plantations and forest protection should
be separated to achieve better efficiency.
A hard drive has been proposed for the mobilisation of national
savings deposits. Even if the target of increasing the deposits
from Rs. 876 crores in 2000-01 to Rs. 1,200 crores this fiscal is
not realised fully, the Government may still be able to get the
estimated Rs. 260 crores as the Centre has decided to devolve the
entire sums mobilised to the State Governments. So, the
Government can forgo this measure. The Government, it is to be
noted, is already excessively dependent on small savings and the
people have been feeling the pinch of its over-drive.
The Paper does not propose measures to clear the entire
accumulated financial liabilities of the Government which comes
to nearly Rs. 5000 crores (The figure given in the Paper is Rs.
3477 crores. This does not account for all the liabilities,
especially the recent accumulations). The plan is to clear them
over a period. This would mean that some of the treasury
restrictions might continue for a few years.
Borrowings by the Government this year is proposed to be limited
to the levels approved by the Planning Commission for the last
year. (The borrowings proposed is to the tune of Rs. 3,180
crores. The total public debt is stated to be Rs. 20,176 crores
at the end of 1999-2000. This would exceed Rs.30,000 by 2002-03
according to projections).
The Government may do well to drop the proposals for extending
the World Bank-aided Forestry Project and avail a high interest
loan from the Japanese Bank for International Cooperation for the
Kerala Water Supply Project. Extravaganzas like the Kerala
Horticulture Development Project need to be shunned. Departments
show a tendency to spent money lavishly when they are flush with
foreign funds. The Paper itself emphasises the need to arrest the
excessive dependence on debts to finance budgetary operations.
The Award of the Eleventh Finance Commission has struck a
crippling fiscal blow on the State's finances. What the State
lost was Rs.3,664 crores to be received over five years (2000-
2005). If this had not happened, the resources needed to be
raised immediately would have come down by half. The State should
approach the Centre for amending this.
The problem with the Kerala State Electricity Board is acute.
The increase in electricity tariffs proposed (60 per cent) is
quite hard to stomach. The Board would need nearly as much
resources as the State to balance its accounts. An enquiry is
needed to fix responsibility for the gross mismanagement. The
people have replaced the Government which mismanaged the State's
finances. If anyone responsible for this sorry state of affairs
remains at the helm of the KSEB, their removal is in order. So,
the Board should be reconstituted with professionals and asked to
propose bail out measures, instead of the Government readily
agreeing to a steep hike in power tariffs.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : CPI(M) suspects TK behind poll report leak Next : Airport director denies security risk | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|