|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, July 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
BJP sees 'anarchy'in T.N., Cong. chides call for President's rule
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, JULY 2. The release of the two Union Ministers in
Chennai did little to prevent the BJP and the Congress from
taking up the cudgels for their allies. Mr. Venkaiah Naidu, Union
Minister for Rural Development, issued an oblique warning saying
that the Centre was studying the situation and would `act
appropriately at the appropriate time and it will not be too
late'.
The Congress called for a code of conduct for Union Ministers
visiting the States.
The Congress once again voiced its opposition to the demands for
the imposition of President's rule in Tamil Nadu. In its view,
the incidents in the State did not amount to breakdown of ``the
constitutional machinery''. The party chided those making such a
demand. ``Those making such a demand are neither being impartial
nor objective,'' said the party spokesperson, Mr. Jaipal Reddy.
He also referred to the video tape released by the Tamil Nadu
police and said that it ``showed that there was more than one
side to the story''. The party, however, refused to be drawn into
the issue of the release of the two Ministers. ``We are not
interested in getting into the charges against the two Union
Ministers.''
The BJP, on the other hand, came down heavily on the AIADMK
Government. Speaking to newspersons at the party headquarters,
Mr. Venkaiah Naidu described the situation in Tamil Nadu as
`anarchic'. The Centre, according Mr. Naidu, was duty- bound to
ensure that the rule of law prevailed and ``would not be a silent
spectator and allow anarchy to prevail in the State.''
Mr. Naidu said the decision to arrest the two Ministers had
brought the State Government in confrontation with the Centre. If
such a situation was allowed to prevail no Union Minister would
be safe.
The Government's decision to recall Ms. Fathima Beevi also came
in for severe criticism from the Nationalist Congress Party
(NCP). Its general secretary and former Solicitor-General, Mr.
Devendra Dwivedi, described the decision as a `retrograde
development'. He also charged the Vajpayee-led NDA Government
with `subverting the Constitutional and political process for
short-term partisan personal ends'.
Describing the developments in Tamil Nadu as ``competitive
irresponsibility'', Mr. Dwivedi also regretted that Ms.
Jayalalithaa, who was herself a victim of vendetta, had resorted
to the same methods. However Mr. Dwivedi saw little merit in the
NDA's charge that the arrests amounted to breakdown of the
Constitutional machinery. He pointed out that under the
Constitution only the President and Governor enjoyed legal
immunity.
Picking holes in the NDA case, Mr. Dwivedi said the two were not
arrested while discharging their duties as Union Ministers and
the validity of the charges against them had to be decided by the
courts and not the Central Government. He also pointed out that
under the Constitution, the State Governments were not
subordinate to the Centre nor was it the duty of the Central
Government to supervise the working of the States. The Supreme
Court had observed ``that the States were as sovereign in their
sphere as the Central Government.''
Mr. Dwivedi also questioned the right of the Union Government to
issue a directive to the State Government. ``There is no scope
for adventurism in the Constitution nor is there a provision for
the Centre to direct the States,'' the NCP leader added.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : SC hearing on Karunanidhi arrest on July 9 Next : Jayalalithaa effigy burnt in Vavuniya | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|