|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
HC judge raps Tamil Nadu Govt.
By A. Subramani
CHENNAI, JULY 4. It was the Madras High Court Judge, Mr. Justice
Narayana Kurup's turn today to slam the Jayalalithaa Government
for taking ``major policy decisions which smack of political
vendetta by ordering arrest and detention of her political rivals
and bureaucrats''.
The caustic observations came when a Division Bench comprising
Mr. Justice Kurup and Mr. Justice A. Ramamurthy was hearing a
habeas corpus petition of a DMK advocate, Mr. Kanagaraj. The
petitioner had said he was denied an audience with the former
Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, by Chennai Central prison
authorities on the pretext that there was a law and order
problem.
Maintaining that Ms. Jayalalithaa's Government was on a sticky
wicket with her appointment itself being a matter pending
adjudication before the Supreme Court, Mr. Justice Kurup asked,
``is it not proper and prudent to keep tempers under cool?''.
``It would be better if the powers-that-be realised that they
were given the mandate only to look after the welfare of the
people and not to take revenge on political adversaries. In a
democracy, there is no place for political vendetta'', he added.
However, the Advocate-General, Mr. N.R. Chandran, explained that
Ms. Jayalalithaa had been elected by her party legislators and
also invited by the Governor to form Government. He pointed out
that the High Court had dismissed three petitions challenging her
appointment as Chief Minister, and there was no stay in
operation. In these circumstances there was nothing wrong in the
Government taking certain executive decisions, he explained.
The Counsel for Jayalalithaa in various cases, Mr. N. Jothi, also
intervened to say that she was a fullfledged Chief Minister with
no legal fetters on her to discharge her duties.
`Embarrassment to Govt.'
Earlier in the day, the Principal Sessions Judge, Mr. S. Ashok
Kumar, hearing the bail application of an accused in the `flyover
scam case', said if the merits of the case were analysed ``it
will be an embarrassment to the Government and bring more things
to light''.
The Judge also told the State Public Prosecutor, Mr.
Gomathinayagam, who had been specially roped in for the case,
that being in-charge of the prosecution in the State, he should
act without any fear and offer proper advice to the Government.
``No guidelines of the Supreme Court have been followed at the
time of arrests. There were commissions and omissions in the
filing of the First Information Report also'', he observed. The
apex court has stipulated that prior to the arrest of well-known
personalities a proper preliminary probe should be conducted, he
added.
Moreover, the Investigating Officer had admitted on Tuesday in
the same court that none of the accused got any pecuniary
advantage from the mini-flyover project, he added.
Mr. Ashok Kumar said that the former Chief Secretary, Mr. K.A.
Nambiar, had undergone surgery only recently and could not stand
or sit for even a short duration. ``His condition is pathetic'',
he observed.
Refusing to heed the PP's request to post the hearing on the bail
plea for Friday, the Judge posted it for 12.30 p.m. tomorrow
(Thursday) saying that more bail applications in connection with
the case were coming up for hearing on that day.
The petitioner, Mr. R.S. Sridhar, was the Taxation Committee
Chairman in the Corporation, besides being the Traffic
Improvement Committee member.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Karunanidhi freed, case to stay Next : India to speed up prisoners' release | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|