|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
We were ignored, say ICSSR members
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, JULY 4. Even as the chairman of the Indian Council of
Social Science Research (ICSSR), Prof. M. L. Sondhi, is crying
foul against efforts by an ``organised caucus'' to ``saffronise''
the oncoming Indo-Pak. dialogue of social scientists, council
members say they have been kept out of the entire ``show''.
Though a mega event - given the fact that nearly 40 social
scientists from Pakistan are expected to participate in the
dialogue - the matter was never brought up before the council as
is necessary whenever expenses of over Rs. 1 lakh are involved.
Reacting to Prof. Sondhi's allegation that an ``organised
caucus'' was planning to disrupt the Indo-Pak dialogue - slated
for July 9 and 10, a few days ahead of the Vajpayee-Musharraf
summit - a council member, Dr. Sardendu Mukherjee, said he had
read about the meeting in newspapers and had till date not been
informed or consulted.
``I have every reason to feel that it is a deliberate slight and
meant to humiliate the members of the council who, like the
chairman, are also appointees of the Ministry of Human Resource
Development,'' Dr. Mukherjee said adding that Prof. Sondhi had
not convened a meeting of the Council for several months. Certain
that nothing much was going to emerge from the dialogue, Dr.
Mukherjee - who has been associated with the Sangh Parivar - also
voiced the hope that the dialogue did not become another forum
for ``India-bashing''.
However, other council members claim that Prof. Sondhi was wary
of convening a meeting for the simple reason that earlier
meetings had never been free of acrimony. ``The last one
practically saw a bitter battle of words between the more
hardcore members of the Sangh Parivar in the council and Prof.
Sondhi,'' said a member on condition of anonymity.
Both Dr. Mukherjee - against whom Prof. Sondhi had complained
earlier - and Mr. Devendra Swaroop, who has been named by Prof.
Sondhi as leading the caucus, denied that they had plans to
disrupt the meeting. ``It is a baseless charge. I am in no way
linked to ICSSR and Prof. Sondhi's letter to the President
appears to be a new version of Don Quixotic attacks on an
imaginary windmill,'' said Mr. Swaroop.
Some days back, Prof. Sondhi had written to the President seeking
his support in ``isolating the vested interests which want to
derail the great initiative shown by Prime Minister Vajpayee in
inviting President Musharraf to India''. According to Prof.
Sondhi, this caucus was led by members within the council who
want to convert ICSSR into a monolithic organisation.
Asked whether the ``caucus'' members had lodged a formal protest
against the meeting, Prof. Sondhi answered in the negative. ``But
we have been receiving threats and invectives.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Rajiv case: CBI interrogates three Tamils Next : CMs to discuss decentralised procurement | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|