|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, July 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Jump-starting the power sector?
INDIA'S POWER SECTOR is today in a situation that evokes more
scepticism than hope. Among the several reasons that have brought
the sector to such a calamitous position, the primary one is its
own failure, over the years, to adhere to basic commercial
principles. That the power sector in a country with severe
dichotomies such as India has to cater to social inequities
should not have clouded some basic facts: the importance of
meeting payment obligations, even if these were between
governmental organisations, and ensuring efficiency in
operations, for instance. It is in this context that the decision
by the Union Government - to provide an added incentive to States
even while remaining firm in not giving in to their demands for a
relief on the payment of current bills - should be seen as an
attempt to set the tone for the more important need of reforming
the power sector. Yet, these measures are to be seen as but
initial steps towards the larger correctives that are required in
the State Electricity Boards (SEBs). For the country to tide over
its present fragile power situation, the SEBs would have to move
away from their unviable operating conditions. And, unless the
harder decisions on restructuring and reform follow the start
made by the Ahluwalia Committee's recommendations could well turn
out to be tenuous.
The grouse of the Central public sector utilities (CPSUs) that
they have been short-changed by continuous defaults - the
Committee estimated the total dues of the SEBs to be Rs. 41,473
crores - also requires serious consideration. In addition to the
fragile nature of Union finances, the increasing realisation that
CPSUs cannot continue along the track of financial dependence
necessitates correctives to be put in place for the country's
power sector in general and for SEBs in particular. Two issues
that require to be grappled with by SEBs are the mounting
transmission and distribution losses and subsidies. That
unbundling of transmission from generation is, by itself, no
salve for ailing SEBs is becoming apparent. It is also
increasingly evident that no single model will be applicable to
all States. Making SEBs viable, simply put, calls for handling
operations in a commercially efficient manner; but this calls for
a considerable de-politicisation of the decision-making process
by the organisations, especially in financial and technical
operations. While there is understandable caution among
governments on the politically sensitive issue of agricultural
tariffs, the solution to the transmission and distribution losses
calls for a firm political resolve to begin with, and a better
technical management. It would only be in the best interests of
the SEBs that their failures, which have resulted in an enormous
leakage of revenue from the system, are corrected.
The success of the turnabout that the SEBs are seeking will lie
largely in their ability to avert a recurrence of the
uncomfortable situation of having to seek waiver of dues. It is
imperative that a clear message is given to the SEBs by the Union
Government that such requests will not be acceded to on a regular
basis. For, postponing bills is but symptomatic of deeper
problems; the solutions to which are also postponed. In
implementing the scheme, which has been decided upon at the
highest political levels of State governments, it should also be
emphasised that there should be no relaxation on what has been
agreed upon and that as and when States err, they will be reined
in. There is, therefore, the urgent need to mix firmness with a
sensitivity to the fact that much of the issues being corrected
now are consequences of callousness of the past. It is in this
context that the Ahluwalia Committee's recommendation for
including ``a package of incentives and disincentives linked to
commercial discipline and initiation of a process of reforms''
should be implemented. Above all, bringing the Indian power
sector back to life calls for a broad realisation amongst all
sections of the country - not just policy-makers, but also power-
users - that hard times require hard measures.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Shadows and substance Next : The roads to authoritarianism | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|