|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 12, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Plus Two: HC seeks Govt. opinion
By Our Staff Reporter
KOCHI, JULY 11. A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on
Wednesday orally sought the Government's opinion on reviewing the
Government's Order sanctioning 387 Plus Two schools in the State
issued last year on a direction of the High Court.
The Bench comprising Mr. Justice K. S. Radhakrishnan and Mr.
Justice G. Sasidharan asked the Additional Advocate General to
make its stand on this issue before the court tomorrow when writ
appeals and contempt of court petition in the Plus Two school
case came up before the Bench today.
The court orally opined that the Government had not followed the
guidelines issued by the High Court earlier while sanctioning the
Plus Two schools afresh. The Bench orally observed that those
schools which gained entry thorough `back door' should not be
allowed to function. The High Court while setting aside the order
granting Plus Two schools in June 2000 had directed the State
Government to issue fresh list of schools after considering the
entire applications.
The Bench had also directed the Government to strictly adhere to
the seven Government Orders containing certain guidelines for
sanctioning the Plus Two schools. In fact, the court had quashed
the earlier Government Order on the ground that the Government
did not follow these guidelines.
Later, a single judge had criticised the Government for not
complying with these guidelines while issuing the fresh order.
The single judge had observed that the granting of 378 Plus Two
schools was illegal and arbitrary as the guidelines prescribed in
the seven Government Orders had not been adhered to.
The single judge had refrained from setting aside the fresh order
in view of the fact that the classes had already begun and that
students already admitted would be affected if the court quashed
the fresh order.
The judge had made the observations while dismissing a writ
petition challenging the fresh order. In fact, in a statement
filed in response to the writ petition, Mr. K. Jayakumar, the
then Secretary, General Education, had said that the State
Government had followed the various Government Orders `in
spirit.'
He had submitted that the 1,429 applications had been sent to the
District Level Committee for scrutiny, instead of the Directorate
of Higher Secondary Education. This was because the Directorate
had earlier scrutinised the applications before issuing the
original order on the grant of Plus Two schools.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : State to seek Central aid for flood relief Next : CBI probe sought into working of Emigration office | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|