|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, July 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
'Biotechnology must come with accountability'
By G. Venkataramani
BANGKOK, JULY 12. Governments and the biotechnology industry
should prepare dossiers not just to satisfy the regulatory
process but as part of an exercise in accountability to civil
society, countries and the environment, indeed to all
stakeholders. This was one of the major conclusions that emerged
at the closing session of the international conference on ``New
Biotechnology Food and Crops: Science, Safety and Society,''
organised here by the U.K. Government in co-operation with the
OECD and the Government of Thailand.
``This implies a complete review of not how the data is collected
and presented but what use is made of it to engage in a dialogue.
The recommendation has implications for inter- governmental
organisations, governments, industry and those who advise on
communication. It has set the trend for international processes
for consensus-building with more openness and inclusiveness,''
said the Earl of Selborne, Chairman of the conference.
Addressing a media conference here today, the Earl said the need
for transparency in consultations with all stakeholders was
emphasised and it was observed that greater transparency by all
parties would help to promote more constructive and meaningful
dialogue. There is need for an accelerated, internationally co-
ordinated programme of capacity- building activities which, in
turn can help speed up the implementation of biosafety protocol.
The Earl stressed the need for high quality, accessible and
relevant science throughout the world to support risk assessment.
``Several speakers drew attention to the decline in publicly
funded research, and the increasing dependence that society has
on research data that might not be considered impartial. Publicly
funded research provides greater confidence and might be easier
to channel into regions for which no financial return on the
research investment can be expected. National governments are
invited to ensure that there is an acceptable balance between
public and private research funding for biosafety applications,''
he said.
In a statement signed by some non-government organisations (NGOs)
from developing countries which participated in the three-day
conference, their representatives said though they were not of
the view that the conference reached consensus, it provided an
opportunity to isolate contentious issues for further
considerations. Lofty claims that GM foods and food production
would address the problems of hunger and malnutrition in
developing countries should be debated. These claims were made by
developed countries and industry in developing countries. ``We
welcome their concern for hunger and malnutrition in developing
countries. However, the solutions for these problems, as indeed
other developmental challenges of the South, must be decided by
the South,'' the statement read.
The problems of hunger in developing countries must be seen in
all their complex ramifications. Without considering these and
other factors, GM foods will not address these issues. ``For us,
biotechnology and GM foods may have a role in addressing hunger
and malnutrition only if embedded in the wider matrix of economic
and development policy of the South. We oppose the idea that any
technology and products arising out of that technology, on their
own and outside of policy variables answer humanity's development
needs,'' said the signatories.
The NGOs called for a fresh debate on the strategies for
combating world hunger and what role, if any, GM foods could have
in such an endeavour. Such a debate should consider the current
global socio-economic and political environment. ``It is crucial
that such a debate is freed from the manipulative arts of public
relations and marketing,'' they said. Now the research and
development of GM food is concentrated in the hands of private
industry and developed countries. Their claims that it would
benefit developing countries give raise to suspicions that
existing field trials may well be designed as testing grounds for
future commercial production. Besides, the industry-based
research initiatives in developing countries are closely linked
to bio-piracy.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Clashes as marches wind down in Ulster Next : Settlers shot at; Israel retaliates | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|