|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, July 14, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
'Friendly' probing does the trick
With some meticulous probing the police could unravel the mystery
of the biggest heist amounting to over Rs. 21 lakhs, writes K.
SRINIVAS REDDY.
THE KNACK of ferreting out information from a suspect is an art.
If the interrogator is a patient man, a prime requisite for the
success of any police officer, more and more pieces of
information -- often unrelated -- would keep tumbling out.
Collating and later co-relating them would lead to some fantastic
results. But all this is for a scientific investigator. A crude
investigator would invariably short circuit the interrogation by
using third degree and would end up with bits and pieces of
information relating to only a particular case.
This was amply proved when officers at Panjagutta police station
began investigating `ventilator offences'. There were three
similar offences in one particular locality -- the modus operandi
adopted was similar. Entry into business establishments was by
cutting open the grills of ventilators and later entering the
premises. In one particular shop, the intruders bolted with a
booty of Rs. 21.94 lakhs in cash. By any standard, this was the
gravest crime to be reported in the recent times.
There were no clues. No finger prints. Only one print which could
be lifted at the ventilator was also smudgy. The way the
intruders entered the building appeared to be a most professional
one. The case was to remain as a watertight crime for the next
two months. But as luck would have it, there were two more
similar offences in the nearby vicinity, but the property lost
was insignificant.
Was there a gang in operation? The investigators were getting
jittery. There was no progress in the probe. Their first
breakthrough came when the police teams could gather descriptive
particulars of two youngsters who were found lurking near the
buildings which had been burgled. Armed with mere descriptions, a
massive manhunt was launched and the plainclothes police teams
did some marvellous job in identifying two youngsters. When they
were picked up for questioning, the duo spilled the beans and
confessed to their involvement in two burglaries.
But what about the biggest burglary where Rs. 21.90 lakhs was
stolen? The duo pleaded innocence. And the interrogators were
caught on the horns of a dilemma. Going by the similar modus
operandi, these two in custody should have also been involved in
the biggest burglary. But going by the way they were pleading
innocence, the police were convinced that they were not involved
in this crime.
It was at this juncture, they began enquiring with the duo about
other burglars. Perhaps, they knew who pulled off the biggest
heist. The `friendly' questioning immediately yielded results.
They were not sure of who could have committed the burglary, but
surely they noticed three persons of their locality spending
money lavishly for the last 60 days. They had no ostensible means
of earning such a large money.
Police officers were curious about this revelation. Any
insignificant piece of information could not be overlooked,
considering the money stolen and surely they gathered some more
information and picked up the trio -- Akhil, Sirajuddin and Aizaz
-- while they were moving in a recently purchased Maruti omni.
Where did they get money to purchase the van? The single question
led to detection of the biggest case in the station history. They
confessed to breaking into the shop and taking away the cash.
They did not expect to find such a huge amount, but they seemed
to have had the beginners' luck.
Having noticed the cash and being unsure of how much to take,
they took Rs. 21.90 lakhs and left almost Rs. 8 lakhs in cash as
they could not carry the bundles. Once they came out, they bought
two Ambassador cars, two motorcycles and a van. But to their ill-
luck, the casual observation of other two alleged burglars
brought an end to their beginners' luck. The trio was arrested
and Rs. 10.40 lakhs in cash was seized in addition to the
vehicles. All the three are now in judicial remand.
(This case was investigated by Inspectors M.Venkateshwar Rao,
Venugopal Rao and Sub-Inspector S. Rajasekhar Rao of Panjagutta
police station).
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Get connected, in a flash Next : Traffic cops' hold on...to no avail | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|