|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Narrating contemporary struggles
The book looks at a padyatra organised in Madhya Pradesh for the
land rights of adivasis and dalits. Movements like the Ekta
Parishad, through non-violent means, attempt to give back to the
deprived their humanity and dignity which the State and other
power structures have denied them in the name of development,
says MAJA DARUWALA.
A SHORT book and a quick-read, Defeated Innocence is about the
struggles of the poor for jamin, jal and jungle. It looks at one
single event - a padyatra for land rights in Madhya Pradesh by
Ekta Parishad, an umbrella organisation of Adivasis and Dalits -
and analyses its genesis, implementation, underlying vision and
the chronology of the struggle. The book is privately published
and will probably get little attention except among the
converted.
This is a real pity, because books like this should be required
reading in courses on development, sociology, law, political
science and certainly Indian administration. This is not because
it is particularly learned but because it speaks from the point
of view of local experiences and captures the richness and
dignity commonplace in millions of every-day lives. For the most
part, governance is not studied as a subject. But it should be
and narratives of contemporary struggles told simply and
sympathetically must not be unfamiliar territory to the educated.
This book is an illustrative primer on ways in which development
can deprive people of all they own, especially their dignity. It
profiles the eminence that exists in village after village
amongst the most poor and disadvantaged and the inordinate
amounts of courage they must bring to their everyday lives simply
in order to survive the day. It forces respect for the average
Indian citizen. This is a quality especially missing in the
education of those who go on to govern large tracts of India and
in the course of their careers, increasingly forget about, and
become alienated from, the people whose servants they are.
The book concentrates on the padyatra as a method of highlighting
issues, creating awareness of rights amongst the unlettered,
mobilising a dispossessed people and finally forcing response
from the State. It stresses what goes into these efforts: into
the psychological preparation and the physical organisation.
Self-help groups and local leadership sit night after night
thinking out the campaign strategy and implementation. As they
work through the logistics, they think about the consequences and
agree to face up the risks. They have to find food, water,
shelter for the night, blankets and transport. Amazingly, people
who have barely enough to cover themselves provide handfuls of
grain, wood for their fires, utensils, and a safe haven wherever
the swelling numbers come to rest. Everyday brings a triumph of
spirit - as when the yatris win a long negotiation for
compensation while the body of the dead woman killed in a work
accident lies rotting in the sun. Or it brings a test of mettle -
as when the Chief Minister will finally only agree to announce
yet another task force to look into land distribution. Throughout
it all, those entrusted with the leadership make efforts to keep
up spirits, keep the fight focussed and get the message out to
the world that there is a fight for justice going on here.
In the absence of an effective and self-confident State - a state
that can free its people from want, ensure personal security and
safety and assure equity and human dignity - more and more the
business of governance is slipping into the hands of non-state
actors. The poor have few alternatives. They can choose to remain
passive receivers of uncertain government largess or remain
oppressed and ruled by traditional systems of caste and power.
Or, as is often the case, the vacuum is filled by violent actors
from the far left and far right who depend on oppression and
violence to ensure dominance.
Large self-help groups like Ekta Parishad offer an attractive
alternative to these options. In an area full of armed feudal
landlords, disaffected bands of violent Marxists, caste-based
vigilante groups, dacoits, and everyday traffickers in women, the
leadership of Ekta Parishad espouses a declared policy of non-
violence. The ideological position of Ekta Parishad is "to
rediscover the radical in Gandhi". They base themselves in the
notion of village revitalisation and getting empowerment to the
very last person. Something which the market economy of today
thinks is so quaint, so anthropologically interesting to observe
and examine, but so helplessly out of tune with the realities of
the day. Its arguments and persuasion are framed in terms of the
demand for implementation and realisation of constitutional
guarantees and protections provided by law.
Groups like Ekta Parishad organise lakhs of people across
thousands of villages into self-helping communities. They can do
so only because they are welcome. But by challenging power
relations and indicating the ineffectiveness of the local
administration, the Ekta Parishad, and its ability to mobilise
the victims into a force for change, has come to occupy a very
contested space. For one, it has become an affront to the State
in a way that the presence of absolute poverty itself has never
been an affront. On the other hand, the very real armed
revolutionaries of the locality see their own ability to capture
peoples' imagination and loyalty blunted by non-violent struggles
and meet this with violence and intimidation. The long absence of
any meaningful land reform also ensures that the final weight of
the mill-stone in which the Adivasi and Dalit poor are ground
down, is added to by the unbroken oppression of the feudal
landlords. The intervention of independence and constitutonalism
have made little difference here. A slew of laws, against forced
labour, usury, untouchability, women's equality and caste-based
discrimination have not budged old power structures. In fact the
old power elite have made a transition into modernity smoothly
and transformed themselves from feudal overlords into present day
political representatives without much of a wrinkle to their
ancient power base.
Since both Naxals and constitutionalists struggle from the same
cause of action, movements like the Ekta Parishad are often
branded as incubators of revolution and seen as a threat to local
law and order by a tense administration that is unused to being
questioned by the poor. Unsubstantiated accusations of being the
cat's paw of foreign influence, religious proselytisers, or
fellow travellers of violent groups, dog efforts to promote a
development that is not centered around profit but around people.
While the State is often in open armed confrontation with violent
groups, it nevertheless resents the power and independence of
non-violent organising groups and seeks to curb them in a
thousand ways. You have only to look at the steady growth of
curbs on NGOs and their right to associate to discern this
pattern.
Ideally, the law should adjudicate these conflicts
dispassionately. But the thought that legislation or the legal
system can come to the rescue has little mention in the book.
Given how increasingly far away the legal system is from ordinary
lives, it is hardly surprising that large mass movements place
little stress on the law as a tool for social change. Instead, it
becomes clear how at every stage the legal system vandalises the
poor of their possessions. To add insult to injury, the laws mock
at the poor by requiring that at every turn they need to read and
write in order to resist a land acquisition order, or to stake
their claim to be the tiller of land, or to protest if someone
has encroached on it, or get permission to use forest produce or
even to retrieve illegally confiscated tools. Whether it is to
steer clear of infringing the many rules and orders that bind
their lives or whether it is to get just about any entitlement,
the citizen needs to present authority with a card, a
registration, a ledger entry, release, license or official
certificate. Deprived of education for 50 years, the majority
must rely on bribing their way through, or be subservient to the
powerful so they can catch the crumbs of patronage as they fall
off the tables of the mighty. They are reduced to seeking
audience and making groveling petitions to the magistrate or
local authority who continue to be their mai-baap in a way that
would have made any coloniser or conquistador envious.
It is hard to understand why people so tragically poor, so ground
under the heal of "law" and so cheated by its provisions should
continue to rely on its ability to provide some protection and
seed change. But despite all, peoples' movements like Ekta
Parishad are rooted in notions of rule of law. With little
evidence to back it up, there remains a touching belief that in
the end the law will come to the aid of the true. They often
approach the higher courts and even win their cases. But court
directions hardly benefit the ground situation. In fact, a win at
court often exacerbates the situation on the ground. Often it
only leads to complete flouting of the law, lays bare the dumb
defiance that is prevalent in the officials in the system and
increases the bitterness of the sufferers. While activists can
make the courts annunciate a broad principle of social justice,
the time and energy wasted in approaching local courts to
adjudicate urgent issues of every day survival seems laughable in
the context of the rural poor. So direct action is increasingly
the option emphasised by those seeking remedies for wrongs done
to them. Certainly the risk may be great but the possibility of
seeding change can be greater than waiting for your day in court.
Rahul Ramagundam, a Ph.D. student at JNU and the author of
Defeated Innocence, identifies himself, as all advocates of good
governance must, with the uphill struggle for equity, social
justice, and human rights being fought by the majority of India's
people - the poor. The author teases out all the strategies and
the methodologies that can lay the foundation for sustained
activism for social justice.
Written with deep sympathy by a clear and sharp eyed observer of
the struggle for survival, the author walks along with the yatris
as they try to regain the basic entitlement which are theirs by
right, theirs by law, theirs by history and yet made unavailable
to them by the design of modern development, the machinations of
the system and the neglect and lethargy of the administration.
What accompanies the reader throughout the text is the
extraordinary will, determination and courage that must be needed
by each very poor, unlettered, often hungry and neglected
individual, preoccupied with issues of survival, to join
together, handful by handful, out of isolated hamlets to become a
great and purposeful march for justice. In coming together they
stake their all in concerted acts of protest in the best
traditions of the Mahatma. There is little promised and no
guarantee of success. Indeed as the book's title indicates, there
is every possibility of defeat staring them in the face, yet it
would seem that they need this effort of self-determination if
only to give themselves a sense of their own humanity even if no
one else will recognise it.
The logic of the marchers' cause is so commonsensical that it is
bewildering to understand why so many lives must be lost, and
time and money wasted, in wresting each entitlement from those
entrusted with democracy. The sheer effort, and energy of
dispossessed people to wake up each morning and determine to take
on the system in solidarity with each other must become more
widely known. On reading this slim book, there is the faintest
chance that envy, if not full blown admiration, will jerk more
privileged readers at least half way out of their seats and
summon a weak cheer even as the tired elite hand sinks back into
lethargy with a moan about "where this country is going to".
Quite clearly, it is going to the people.
Defeated Innocence: Adivasi Assertion, Land Rights and the Ekta
Parishad Movement, Rahul Ramagundam, Grassroots India, p. 156,
Rs. 299.
The writer is Director, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : A whole way of life Next : Success is in the air | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|