|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
'Gadar' at Agra
TODAY is summit day. The early unnatural euphoria about the
prospects for peace have evaporated. Mr. Vajpayee and Gen.
Musharraf may yet come up with something to show their
constituencies that if not now peace is at least possible in the
future.
But we forget that the two leaders cannot conjure up bilateral
friendship on their own. Prime ministers, presidents and generals
can make war, but not peace. The antagonism that has been
nurtured for decades by political and military establishments can
be undone only by the citizens of the two countries.
Unfortunately, this antagonism that borders on hatred has taken
such deep root that it is difficult to visualise friendship
between India and Pakistan for years to come.
It is unbelievable that Mr. Vajpayee and Gen. Musharraf will be
talking peace even as audiences in Agra and elsewhere in the
country will be soaking in the film "Gadar". A more incendiary
film about relations between the two countries has probably never
been made before in India. A more nauseating film that stokes
contempt among Indians for all things Pakistani (and in very
thinly veiled terms for all things Islamic as well) has probably
never before been screened in India. And this is a huge success
at the box office.
As on many occasions in the past, the Islamic groups which have
been protesting the film have been doing so for the wrong
reasons. It is not objectionable that the girl is called Sakina.
It is even less so that Sakina is seen on occasion offering namaz
with sindur in her hair. The fundamental problem with "Gadar" is
that in this era of flag-waving patriotism the makers of the film
have whipped up a fervour of jingoism in which the true Indian is
one who is superior to a Pakistani in all respects. There is
nothing redeeming about any of the Pakistani characters in the
film. All of them, from the shepherd's wife to the army officer,
are either deceitful, villainous, oafish or just cowards. In
contrast, Tara Singh, the Indian one-man army, from across the
border is decent, loyal, and of impeccable character. And he only
has to bellow before policemen and army men in Pakistan scatter
to the winds. The film is littered with "dialogue stealers" like
"Beta baap se nikalta hai. Hindustan Pakistan ka baap hai. (A son
is the creation of his father. India is the father of Pakistan".)
When Amrish Puri, Mayor of Lahore, falls to his knees and begs
forgiveness from our Tara Singh, the subjugation of Pakistan is
complete. "Gadar" is not a film of love across religions during
the communal bloodbath of 1946-1948, as it professes to be. It is
instead a film about using this apology of a love story to show
that Indians can bring Pakistanis to their knees if they want to.
The boorishness of "Gadar" matters for three reasons. That a film
like this can even be made. That the audiences whistle and cheer
at "powerful" scenes which reflect bigotry and jingoism. And that
we like it so much that it threatens to become the most
successful Hindi film in years. This cannot be a uniquely Indian
phenomenon. I would be surprised if "mirrors" of our "Gadars"
have not been made in Pakistan with devious, cowardly and weak-
kneed Indians vanquished by a single Pakistani. And it is not the
films that are made which say so much about our deep-rooted
feelings about each other. The Indian foreign policy
establishment calls our neighbours "Pakis". They call us "Lalas".
And two decades of exchanges of cricket on the field have only
made these games more of gladiatorial contests, as Mr. Jaswant
Singh so well described them, with the spectators in India,
Pakistan and Sharjah more often than not baying for blood on the
fields.
Mr. Vajpayee and Gen. Musharraf will get the Nobel Peace Prize if
by some miracle they come up with an Agra accord. But like the
Oslo accord that gave Mr. Yasser Arafat, Mr. Yitzhak Rabin and
Mr. Shimon Peres the Nobel Peace Prize in 1994 but no peace in
West Asia and so too like the 1998 Nobel for Mr. David Hume and
Mr. John Trimble for the Good Friday accord on Northern Ireland,
this one will be a peace without content. Unless the poison that
breeds "Gadars" is flushed out from the two societies.
C. RAMMANOHAR REDDY
E-mail the writer at crr100@india.com
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Peace hath her victories Next : The censor within | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|