|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, July 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Maars merger with Mascon Global off
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, JULY 19. The proposal to merge Maars International
Software with Mascon Global has been spiked. A decision to this
effect was taken by the boards of the two companies which met
yesterday.
They have cited the ``current market conditions'' for dropping
the merger plan. Given the ``stock market conditions'', the
``merger at this stage is not in the interest of the
shareholders,'' says a delayed release from Mascon. Surprisingly
enough, both the companies claim that they will work in tandem to
do business.
According to Mr. V. Vedantham, Director, Maars Software, the
decision was also caused by the `slower than expected' growth in
IT (information technology) sector.
Nevertheless, the announcement comes in the wake of similar
failures experienced by couple of other Chennai-based companies
on the takeover front.
Polaris Software is entangled in legal battle over its proposal
to take over Data Inc of the U.S. Similarly, PentaMedia
Graphiscs' proposal to acquire Film Roman of the U.S., too, has
come under cloud.These takeovers and mergers were announced with
a lot of fanfare. The inability of these companies to take their
stated intentions to logical end has been causing quite a
consternation among investors and the regulator alike.
PentaMedia and Polaris may plead helplessness since the issue has
gone `out of their hands'.
In the case of merger of Maars with Mascon, the stated reason for
crying off the move - stock market conditions - has not really
helped the cause of corporate governance any bit.Only in March
this year, the respective boards of these companies had approved
a swap ratio of one Mascon share for every nine shares of Maars.
The IT industry scene - both here and the U.S. - was slowing down
even at that point of time. Mr. Vedantham's reasoning for calling
off the merger, industry observers argue, may not quite carry
conviction.
Market pundits, nonetheless, feel that the regulator should
devise a mechanism which discourages companies from announcing
mergers and take-overs only to call them off at convenient times.
The regulator, it is felt, must direct the exchanges to
compensate investors from out of the investor protection fund for
the loss, if any, sustained due to abrupt end to merger
proposals.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Modest fall in Sensex Next : Rupee stages smart recovery | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|