|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, July 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Next
'Amarnath pilgrims number cannot be raised'
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, JULY 19. The Jammu & Kashmir Government today
submitted before the Delhi High Court that it could not
accommodate more pilgrims wishing to visit the Amarnath shrine
this year.
The High Court had on July 17 asked the State Government to tell
whether it could allow more pilgrims to the shrine.
Counsel for the Government said that due to security constraints
and bad weather, the administration would not be able to make
proper arrangements if more pilgrims were permitted. About 3,500
pilgrims are allowed to move for the shrine from Jammu every day.
The counsel submitted a copy of communication between the State
Tourism Secretary and Tourism Director before a division bench
comprising Mr. Justice Arajit Pasayat and Mr. Justice D.K. Jain
in support of the it's decision not to permit more pilgrims.
The Bench has been hearing two public interest litigations (PILs)
challenging the restrictions put on the number of pilgrims to the
shrine every year.
In their petitions, Shri Amarnath Yatra Welfare Board and Mr.
Durgainder Singh, an advocate, submitted that restricting the
number of pilgrims to 3,500 each day was tantamount to
prohibiting pilgrims from undertaking the pilgrimage which was
violative of a devout's right to free movement and worship, and,
therefore, liable to be struck down.
Opposing the compulsory registration of pilgrims, the petitioners
said that it was violative of the right to freedom of religion
and the court's guidelines issued in 1997 on how the yatra should
to conducted.
They also urged the court to mandate the Government to provide
proper shelter, civic amenities and medicare to pilgrims on the
entire route from Chandanwari or Baltal to the holy cave.
They further submitted that organising free food (bhandara) for
the pilgrims was an integral part of any ritual in the Hindu
religion; hence, the Government's decision not to allow any
organisation to make arrangement for it was violative of Article
25 of the Constitution whereby freedom of conscience and free
profession, practice and prorogation of religion is guaranteed.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Next : Sena bid to discuss report thwarted | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|