|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
'Cross-border terrorism was linked to Kashmir'
By B. Muralidhar Reddy
ISLAMABAD, JULY 21. The Pakistan President, Gen. Pervez
Musharraf, has claimed that India had agreed at the Agra summit
to the `centrality of Kashmir' as the main cause that has
bedevilled relations between India and Pakistan.
A senior Indian diplomat, who was privy to the parleys between
the two sides at Agra told The Hindu that while Gen. Musharraf's
claim was not incorrect, the Indian acceptance of Kashmir as an
issue was part of a carefully-worded formulation that linked it
to the concern over `cross-border terrorism'.
At his televised news conference on Friday, Gen. Musharraf
claimed that a table and two chairs were ready at the local hotel
for the signing-in ceremony of the joint declaration and both
sides had agreed on at least two separate drafts of the
declaration.
``Do you think I would have agreed to have any declaration or
statement if the centrality of the Kashmir issue was not agreed
upon by India?'' Gen. Musharraf shot back when a reporter wanted
to know if the agreed draft declaration had acknowledged Kashmir
as the core issue of tension between India and Pakistan.
At one stage in the course of the two-hour press conference, Gen.
Musharraf said at no point of time in Agra did Pakistan give up
its `principled position' on Kashmir. ``Honestly I have no idea
about the reasons and circumstances under which the Prime
Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, could not agree to the
mutually-agreed draft declaration. I must say that Mr. Vajpayee
was sincere and open-minded in his approach towards the
resolution of the Kashmir dispute. I am optimistic that Mr.
Vajpayee wants the process to continue and we would hopefully
arrive at a mutually-acceptable solution.''
The diplomat contested Gen. Musharraf's claim that both the sides
had twice arrived at an agreement. ``Leave alone twice, there was
no agreement even once. If there was a mutually- accepted draft
why would we have not gone ahead and signed it?'' he asked.
It appears that the confusion on the so-called two agreed drafts
arose because the Pakistani side tried to sidestep normal
resolution procedures. ``When recognised and sought to be
corrected, there were insinuations that hidden hands were coming
in the way of an agreement''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Pak. accuses India of firing on LoC Next : Pak. firing in Kargil continues | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|