|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
Could MEA spokesperson have gone beyond her brief?
By Atul Aneja
NEW DELHI, JULY 21. As the dust begins to settle on the Agra
summit and post-mortem gather momentum, ``media management''
entrusted to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has come in
for sharp criticism.
Ms. Nirupama Rao, newly-appointed spokesperson for the Ministry,
has been fiercely, and many feel unfairly, attacked for the
``media fiasco'' at Agra.
Is the anger against Ms. Rao justified? Could the MEA's external
publicity division have done better? In briefing halls, crowded
cafeterias or any other assemblage of journalists, an end to the
discussion on this does not appear to be in sight.
The themes agitating the media are familiar. One revolves around
Ms. Rao's scarce presence at the media centre at the Mughal
Sheraton hotel in Agra. The other is her terse Government
statements on the happenings in the Jaypee Palace Hotel where the
Prime Minister, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, and the Pakistan President,
Gen. Pervez Musharraf, were holding endless rounds of talks. Ms.
Rao's refusal to take questions on the statements she read out
has also been commented upon.
While acknowledging that the media's grouse may not be unfounded,
official sources observing the developments have an explanation.
Ms. Rao, they say, could not have gone beyond her brief drawn by
senior members of the Indian delegation. The MEA, for instance,
had decided that it would not conduct diplomacy through the media
while the talks were on. It was this understanding that was
reflected in the statements Ms. Rao read out. In no way could an
officer of the Joint Secretary rank flout the iron-clad
parameters she had been asked to uphold before the media.
Neither can she be blamed for not taking questions, for the
decision against a question-and-answer session was also taken at
the top. In other words, Ms. Rao was asked to conduct before the
media a performance rigidly choreographed by her superiors.
For most of the day on July 16, Ms. Rao was absent at the media
centre - for which she has been severely criticised. But her
advocates say it is unfair to blame her. She had to be at the
Jaypee Palace hotel where expectations were high that a joint
declaration could be signed any moment after noon.
By that afternoon there was no change in Gen. Musharraf's plan to
leave for Ajmer around 2 p.m., reinforcing the expectation of a
joint declaration. Ms. Rao, therefore, had to be in the hotel to
meet the 2 p.m. deadline and also arrange a press conference
which was also planned if the talks succeeded.
But with a breakthrough turning elusive, the schedule for the
signing ceremony and the press conference kept slipping. In
confining herself to the hotel till about midnight, Ms. Rao was a
prisoner of a highly dynamic and unpredictable situation.
As for her unavailability during the summit, sources clarified
that her cellular phone number had been widely distributed to
Indian mediapersons.
Interaction with the media became unsavoury when Ms. Rao was
heckled by a group of angry journalists, mostly from Pakistan.
They blamed her for standing in the way of a midnight press
conference by Gen. Musharraf at the Amar Vilas hotel. Sources say
that Ms. Rao could not be held responsible for this as the
decision not to hold the press conference was taken on security
considerations.
While the Pakistani Government spokesman, Mr. A.A. Gondal, has
expressed regret over the incident, no such apology, contrary to
media reports, has come from any diplomat of the Pakistani High
Commission.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Mayawati expels three leaders | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|