|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 26, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Govt. nominee back on UTI Board
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, JULY 25. In keeping with the swift moves being made
after the Unit Trust of India (UTI) fiasco came to light, the
Union Finance Ministry has got back its nominee on the UTI board.
The Joint Secretary in the capital markets division of the
Ministry, Mr. Jamini Bhagwati, will now be on the Board.
Under the UTI Act, the Government cannot directly place its
nominee. Instead, the Industrial Bank of India (IDBI) has this
power and even in the past, it was the IDBI which nominated a
Finance Ministry official. The same process has been followed
this time too.
In 1993-94, a move was made to withdraw the Finance Ministry
nominee from the UTI board as it was felt that in a liberalised
environment, the Government should give a free hand to the
institution to function and take investment decisions. But the
then Finance Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, turned down the
suggestion.
A similar move was made in 1997 and the same arguments were
forwarded that the Ministry nominee should be withdrawn. The then
Finance Minister, Mr. P. Chidambaram, agreed and has also
indicated recently that the UTI board was broadbased and
professionalised and the Ministry nominee was withdrawn to send a
signal that the UTI Chairman was the boss and not the Ministry
nominee.
The present Finance Minister, Mr. Yashwant Sinha, has made much
of the fact that the Ministry was handicapped without a nominee
as it could not ascertain first hand what was happening at the
board meetings and what items were on the agenda. During the
debate in Parliament on the UTI scam, Mr. Sinha is expected to
rub in this point to say that it was the United Front Government
which withdrew Governmental supervision over the functioning of
one of the largest mutual funds in India.
Meanwhile, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
Chairman, Mr. N. Rangachary, today cautioned the Life Insurance
Corporation and the General Insurance Corporation and its former
subsidiaries should adhere to the prudential norms if they
decided to buy any of the UTI's bulk holding of equity.
Mr. Rangachary said at a meeting organised by a chamber of
commerce that clear investment norms had been laid down and
insurance companies would have to follow them. ``If they follow
the guidelines, we have no objections to their buying the equity
held by UTI,'' he said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Phoolan Devi, victim of violent times Next : Our investment in US-64 not improper: Left | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|