|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Next
N.Ireland: Parties asked to respond by Aug. 6
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, AUG 1. In what was seen as the last gamble to save the
Northern Ireland peace process, the British and Irish Governments
today confronted the political parties in the province with a
take-it-or-leave-it compromise package warning them that their
failure to reach an agreement would be ``nothing short of
tragic''.
The parties have been told to give their response by August 6 - a
week before the constitutional deadline to resolve the present
political crisis ends. The immediate reaction, however, was not
very hopeful as both sides indicated that their response would
depend on how far the package addressed their concerns.
Independent experts noted that the proposals appeared to be
``tilted'' towards Republicans with barely a passing reference to
the Unionists' demand for IRA to give up its weapons. It was on
this issue that the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) chief, Mr. David
Trimble resigned last month as head of the provincial government,
triggering the present crisis.
There was widespread scepticism if the package would be
acceptable to the Unionists who continued to maintain that
nothing short of iron-clad guarantees on decommissioning would
satisfy them. They wanted to know from Republicans what they
meant by offering to put their weapons ``beyond use''. The idea
of merely putting concrete ``caps'' on some of their bunkers was
not acceptable to Unionists who insisted that all arms dumps must
be filled with concrete to render the weapons unusable. They also
demanded a firm date when decommissioning would start.
The Northern Ireland Secretary, Dr. John Reid and the Irish
Foreign Affairs Minister, Mr. Brian Cowen portrayed the package
as a last chance to save the Good Friday Agreement and appealed
to the political parties to consider it with a ``cool head'' and
``steady nerves'', and not to rush into a judgment. They denied
that the proposals were tilted in favour of either side, and
repeatedly urged leaders not to approach them as though they were
a ``league table''. They were not about ``concessions'' or
``victory or defeat'' for anyone, Mr. Reid said as he appealed to
party leaders to keep the ``big picture'' in mind - the need to
sustain the Good Friday agreement. There were going to be no
winners if the agreement was destroyed, and the consequences
would be damaging for everyone, he warned.
Mr. Cowen said the proposals on offer were ``fair'' and
``balanced'' and represented the collective endeavour of the two
governments. They addressed the four major concerns - policing,
decommissioning, demilitarisation and stability of political
institutions set up in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement.
Earlier, Mr. Reid acknowledged that the package would not please
everyone but said it was the best under the circumstances. It
consisted of inter-independent proposals and political parties
should not try to ``pick and choose'' what suited them.
They were intended to ensure victory for the people of Northern
Ireland by sustaining an agreement that had arguably brought
peace and prosperity to the province.
Details were not known, but analysts said the package appeared to
be designed almost entirely to ``win'' over the Republicans in
the hope that in turn, they would agree to start decommissioning.
Apparently, the package goes some length to address Republican
concerns on police reforms, role for ex- paramilitary prisoners,
and scaling down the British security presence in the province.
``It is very much aimed at winning over the Republicans and
presumably the two Governments expect a response from them on
decommissioning'', a commentator told the BBC.
The presumption in informed circles was that if Sinn Fein and IRA
accepted the package then it would mean that they were willing to
make a move on decommissioning as a reciprocal gesture. Their
response on decommissioning was said to be ``crucial'' to the
fate of the package. They were expected to meet at the weekend to
take a decision.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Next : U.S. House votes to ban human cloning | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|