|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Catholicos' move on land purchase draws flak
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, AUG. 1. The Malankara Orthodox Almaya
Association, Thiruvananthapuram, has taken serious exception to
the Malankara Metropolitan's insistence on purchasing the land
worth lakhs of rupees which the Puthupally St. George Orthodox
parish proposes to acquire, in his name.
In a joint statement here today, Mr. P.V. Varghese, president,
and Prof. P.M. George, general secretary of the association, and
Prof. K. Joshua, Chief Editor of `The Orthodox Voice' said the
Metropolitan had asked the vicar not to sign the cheque if the
property was not being bought in his name.
They felt that the Catholicos' intervention amounted to the
misuse of his spiritual authority over the vicar and the flagrant
violation of the constitution of the church and all ethical
principles.
They pointed out that the Supreme Court had in its judgment,
pronounced in 1995 on a litigation which began in 1974 relating
to the control of the parish churches and properties,
categorically stated that their ownership was vested with the
parish itself and that the final authority for their
administration was the parish assembly and its elected managing
committee. They contended that whatever jurisdiction the diocesan
Metropolitan and the Malankara Metropolitan had over the parishes
was confined to spiritual matters. In temporal matters, their
powers were purely supervisory as provided for in the
constitution of the church.
They said that article 23 of the constitution of the church
which had been upheld by the apex court stated beyond a shadow of
doubt that the property of a parish was to be purchased or sold
on the basis of a decision of the parish assembly concerned and
with the concurrence of the diocesan Metropolitan. They argued
that the term concurrence did not imply any obstruction in the
process of acquisition. It was only a provision to enable the
Metropolitan to tender proper advice or guidance in the best
interests of the parish.
They charged the Malankara Metropolitan with having embarked
recently on a programme of systematically undermining the
provisions of the constitution and resorting to the back-door
method of annexing the properties through illegal and improper
ways. They feared that if the unhealthy trend was not effectively
checked, it would bring disaster to the Orthodox Church as a
whole.
They wanted the legal battle which the Catholicos had been
waging against the Thiruvananthapuram St. George Orthodox parish
for the last 23 years to secure for himself the rent from the Mar
Baselios Memorial Building belonging to the parish and which was
constructed by the parish with its funds, to serve as an
eyeopener to the Orthodox community.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Manichan's wife held, in judicial custody Next : Probe by multi-disciplinary experts sought into RCC issue | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|