|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, August 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Opposition motion on UTI muddle defeated
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, AUG. 2. An Opposition-sponsored motion censuring the
Government on the Unit Trust of India (UTI) issue was negated in
the Lok Sabha today amid uproarious scenes and without the
Finance Minister, Mr. Yashwant Sinha, being permitted to finish
his reply to an acrimonious debate earlier.
The debate on the adjournment motion moved by Mr. Priyaranjan
Dasmunshi of the Congress turned into an unprecedented event as
the Finance Minister finally got up to reply.
A grim-faced Mr. Sinha, who had been targeted by many members for
his ``failure'' to manage the UTI affairs and whose resignation
had been sought by almost all Opposition members, made some
references to Congress member, Mr. Mani Shankar Iyer's
intervention and then turned to the RJD member, Mr. Raghuvansh
Prasad. ``His intervention is not worth my reply,'' the Finance
Minister said which immediately provoked the Congress and RJD
members to protest the Minister's ``indiscretion''.
The Speaker, Mr. G.M.C. Balayogi's ruling that he would look into
the records and take action, if necessary, failed to pacify the
members who then stormed the well of the House.
The atmosphere became tense as the NDA back-benchers also stood
up and joined in the slogan-shouting. The Prime Minister, Mr.
Atal Behari Vajpayee, and the Leader of the Opposition, Ms. Sonia
Gandhi, were present.
While a section of members who were in the well demanded an
apology from Mr. Sinha, some others demanded his resignation.
Slogans like ``vit mantri istifa do'' (Finance Minister must
resign) rent the air which was soon replaced with the demand from
the Opposition ``we want a JPC.''
Prompt came the reply from the BJP benches who replaced JPC with
BJP. Mr. Dasmunshi continued to demand a JPC probe as well as an
inquiry into the role of the Prime Minister's Office in the UTI
affairs.
While the slogan-shouting lasted for quite a while, the Prime
Minister did make an attempt to address the House, but soon gave
up as the din continued.
With the situation running into a stalemate, the Deputy Speaker,
Mr. P.M. Sayeed, who was now in the Chair, announced that the
Finance Minister would not reply and put the motion to vote which
was negated through a voice-vote.
Earlier, during the debate, the Finance Minister came in for
considerable attack. Mr. Somnath Chatterjee (CPI-M) read out from
the UTI Act to establish the fact that the Government was deeply
involved in the setting up and functioning of the UTI.
Mr. Sinha's contention that it was an autonomous organisation in
which the Government had no role did not wash, he emphasised.
Reminding Mr. Sinha of the Constitutional responsibility of a
Minister to inform Parliament and through it the people about
matters affecting the public, Mr. Chatterjee said the Finance
Minister had failed on this score. ``He has forfeited his right
to sit in that chair. Mr. Finance Minister, you have abdicated
your responsibility. You should resign,'' he said.
Mr. Raghuvansh Prasad, in his intervention, pointed out that
under Mr. Sinha's stewardship of the Finance Ministry, there has
been a stock market scam, an excise scam in which the Chairman of
the Central Board of Excise and Customs was arrested on
corruption charges and now the UTI scam.
``On charges of conspiracy, Mr. Laloo Yadav is being sent to jail
repeatedly while he is sitting here,'' Mr. Prasad said pointing
to Mr. Sinha. ``He says he did not know anything. Can an ignorant
Minister continue in Government. He should resign and he should
be arrested,'' Mr. Prasad said.
While the Congress and the NDA members charged each other with
mismanaging the UTI at different points of time, some members
from other parties referred to the fact that blaming each other
would not solve the issue and instead an attempt should be made
to correct things so that ordinary investors were not duped in
future.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Slogans, counter-slogans | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|