|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, August 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Oustees not yet resettled properly
By Gargi Parsai
NEW DELHI, AUG. 4. A committee set up by the Maharashtra
Government on the directions of the Supreme Court to assess the
progress of the resettlement of the people displaced by the
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) on the Narmada river has strongly
recommended that the height of the dam be not raised any further
since people displaced at the present height of 90 metres are yet
to be offered any proper rehabilitation options. It noted the
State's inability to do so on account of incorrect surveys,
absence of a master-plan and the non-availability of land.
In a strong indictment of the Maharashtra Government after
visiting the sites and speaking to the affected tribals, the
five-member committee chaired by a retired judge, Mr S.M. Daud,
observed that ``there were contradictions on the ground reality
and the figures furnished by the State Government''. It asked the
State to correct its data and notify the correct position to the
Narmada Control Authority which had taken vital decisions (with
regard to raising 3-metre-high humps on the dam) based on the
States' versions.
Delivering its judgment in October last year on a petition filed
by the Narmada Bachao Andolan for reviewing the cost and benefits
of the Sardar Sarovar Project in Gujarat, the Supreme Court had
directed the riparian States of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh to
set up committees for assessing the ground realities of
rehabilitation of the affected tribals in the valley. The Daud
Committee was set up by the Maharashtra State.
Raising dam height
``The Government should not use incorrect information merely
because a stamp of finality has been conferred upon it at the
Mantrayal level. It has the responsibility to see that it does
not accept any proposal to raise the height of the dam beyond the
existing height of 90 meters unless the obligations laid down by
the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal and the Supreme Court are
fulfilled as a whole in regard to those affected at 90 metres and
are yet to be resettled,'' the committee said.
In its report submitted to the Maharashtra Chief Minister, Mr.
Vilasrao Deshmukh, last month, the committee recommended that a
fresh survey of the people threatened out of their homes and
livelihoods be conducted in all the affected villages. Several
thousand affected had been left out of Government consideration,
the panel said in its report submitted to the State last month.
Of the 245 villages that will be submerged on account of the mega
project in Gujarat, 33 fall in Maharashtra and a majority in
Madhya Pradesh. There are more than 5000 tribal families in the
Maharashtra villages, some of who have not been taken into
account at all.
The committee recommended that the assistance of NGOs such as the
Narmada Bachao Andolan (led by Medha Patkar) who have the
confidence of the people be solicited and welcomed in ensuring
proper rehabilitation and resettlement of all people who face
displacement and threat to their livelihoods.
It said that `gramsabhas' be involved in collecting the factual
information within a reasonable period of time of the tribals who
will be displaced by the mega project. ``Tribals lack the skills
to communicate with the officialdom, which also has the tendency
to ignore their grievances,'' it observed in a 15- page report.
The 33 villages to be submerged are from two taluks of Nandurbar
district. The tribals of these villages are in occupation and
settlement of that region from times immemorial. Except of one
family of the priests at Shoolpaneshwar temple in Manibeli, the
entire affected population comprises tribals who are not merely
dependent on supplemental income from forest and river produce
but partly also on animal breading and poultry, the committee
observed.
Quoting from `adivasi' life, the committee said that tribals had
been living on their land for generations. They had formed these
villages, named them, had their gods and goddesses, took good
care of the region and never came for any outside help and were
living a peaceful, self-sufficient and contented life. ``Now you
come and take away from us all this and are leaving us without
any livelihood and support. These forests, the river and our
lands have been part of our lives for centuries and you come and
call us encroachers on our own land,'' the committee quotes
tribals as saying.
The tribals in Maharashtra talked to the committee of the
unavailability of land to resettle them, of no legal rights over
land claimed to be allotted to some, about uncultivable the land,
police atrocities, corruption, ex-parte notices, underestimation
of project-affected people and so on. The tribals resettled in
Gujarat talked of no jobs, no lands, no land rights, no
irrigation, dispersal of communities, and that they were better
off in their original villages.
The constitution in its very preamble speaks of several values
but places first that of justice in social, economic and
political context, and the tribals who will lose their all,
should get just that, the committee said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : National tribal policy mooted Next : Vast areas inundated in Assam, Army to the aid of Bihar | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|