|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, August 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Blast puts Ulster deal in doubt
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, AUG 4. The latest initiative to defuse the political
crisis in Northern Ireland today looked headed for a dead-end as
the police warned of a ``murderous'' new phase in republican
terrorism following Thursday's bomb blast in west London, alleged
to be part of the terrorists' ``worrying new agenda'' to wreck
the Good Friday Agreement.
Both Unionists and Nationalists were reported to be having second
thoughts over the joint British-Irish peace package in the light
of the new terrorist offensive and it seemed unlikely that they
would be able to meet the August 6 deadline for a decision.
Despite attempts to put on a brave face, it was clear that the
Real IRA, believed to be behind the explosion, had succeeded in
slowing down the momentum towards an early solution. The two
sides admitted that it had made their task more difficult and
that hardliners were back on top again. ``It won't wreck the
peace process as the Real IRA want but it will make a difficult
job even more difficult,'' republicans told The Guardian.
Analysts said what the bomb had done was to blow a hole through
the three most crucial elements of the peace package:
decommissioning by IRA, police reforms and scaling down security
in Northern Ireland. Until the bomb happened, there was
considerable optimism over a breakthrough with the IRA expected
to make a ``gesture'' on decommissioning in exchange for more
explicit assurances on policing and security. But Thursday's
blast has dramatically changed the situation and signals from the
Sinn Fein/IRA camp today suggested a rethink. Their view seemed
to be that decommissioning at this stage would be exploited by
the Real IRA in its propaganda war against the IRA whom it
portrays as a ``traitor'' to the Republican cause by signing the
Good Friday Agreement.
With decommissioning clearly on hold, the package was seen to be
in deep freeze as the Unionists have made it clear that the peace
process cannot move forward so long as the IRA continues to hold
on to it weapons. On policing and demilitarisation too, the
Unionists' attitude hardened and the Ulster Unionist Party's
chief negotiator, Sir Reg Empey denounced the proposals for
police reforms as ``an absolute nonsense''. Unionists believed
that any move that might weaken security at a time when police
were warning of a new climate of violence was fraught with risk.
They strongly opposed the proposal, contained in the peace
package, to bring down military installations as demanded by the
republicans. Independent observers echoed the view that any
significant change in security profile at this stage would make
the province more vulnerable to terrorism.
``If the Government's proposals (for scaling down security) were
implemented, the British army would be dramatically circumscribed
in its ability to monitor and interdict terrorist activity in the
republican heartlands of South Armagh and Tyrone where the Real
IRA has considerable and growing support,'' The Times said
arguing that while compromises were necessary to secure peace,
security itself should not be compromised.
Meanwhile, London was on full alert as police warned that there
could be more terrorist attacks in the coming days. Heavy
security marked the queen mother's 101st birthday celebrations
and Londoners were told to be extremely vigilant.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : JVP comes up with a 'face-saving' formula Next : Consensus on German immigration policy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|