|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, August 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
Involve NBA in rehabilitation of dam oustees: report
By Gargi Parsai
NEW DELHI, AUG. 6. The report of the five-member Daud Committee,
set up by the Maharashtra Government to assess the rehabilitation
and resettlement of the people affected by the Sardar Sarovar dam
project, wants the Medha Patkar-led Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA)
involved in the rehabilitation of the oustees. The NBA has the
confidence of people and its influence should be welcomed, the
report, on which the State Government is silent, says.
The report, submitted three weeks ago, has suggested that a
seven-member committee be constituted to oversee the process of
rehabilitation. The proposed committee should include
representatives from the NBA and the local Punarvasan Sangharsh
Samiti (PSS), representative of the tribal community each from
the original villages and the rehabilitation sites. Rest of the
members should be nominated by the Government from the Revenue,
Forest, Tribal Affairs and Rehabilitation departments.
The Assessment Committee, chaired by retired judge, Mr. S.M.
Daud, had as its members, MP, Mr. Manikrao Gavit, barrister, Mr.
Sharad Palav, Mr. R.V. Bhuskute and as special invitee, Ms.
Pratibha Shinde. The report says that displaced tribals will have
additional protection if their representative oversees the work
of rehabilitation. It suggests that the tribal MP, Mr Manikrao
Gavit, and Mr K.C. Padvi, Member of the State Legislature from
Nandurbar, also be involved in the rehabilitation process whether
they continue to be members of the respective legislatures or
not. About 40,000 families in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and
Maharashtra are facing submergence by the Sardar Sarovar project
in Gujarat.
The committee has recommended that gram sabhas be associated with
the assessment and development process of the people who are
uprooted.
Land allotment
In what should be an eye-opener for the Government, the Committee
has found several instances of same land being allotted to more
than one person affected by the project, leading to problems
between the oustees. Likewise, there are several instances of
allotment of agriculture land, which does not measure up to the
promised one or two hectares or being rocky or sandy and covered
with streams and drains, irremovable weeds and shrubs. There were
also cases of allotments of land on paper only.
During its visit to the rehabilitation sites, the committee found
instances of tribals having being shifted to the rehabilitation
sites, but not given their entitlements of farm land as it was
not available. ``Non-availability of agriculture land to those
being uprooted is not something for which the tribals can be held
responsible. The Government has to make good this recompense, if
not in the rehabilitation site, then somewhere in close
proximity. Refusal of an affected person to move out from
villages earmarked for submergence due to non- availability of
rehabilitation land with legal titles cannot be given as a reason
by the Government for making ex parte allotment of land,'' the
Committee says.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Education Ministers want 'curriculum framework' withdrawn | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|