|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Muslims oppose Ladakh's Union Territory demand
By Shujaat Bukhari
LEH, AUG. 7. The demand to make Ladakh a union territory (UT) is
confined to the Buddhists of Leh district, and it is loosing
momentum with the opposition from the majority Muslims. The
Muslim population in the Ladakh region is 1,11,729 while the
Buddhist population 1,5,956. But the president of the Ladakh
Buddhists Association (LBA), Mr. Tsering Samphel, who frequents
Jammu and Delhi rather than Srinagar, says ``we are talking on
behalf of the entire Ladakh''. According to him, the Leh
Autonomous Hill Development Council (LAHDC) is the first step
towards the separation from the State.
Leh Buddhists vociferously support the UT demand. This is despite
the fact that two Buddhists are in the Farooq Abdullah Government
- Mr. T. Namgayal, MLA from Nobra, and Mr. Koushak Togdan
Rimpooche, nominated MLC. A religious leader, Mr. Koushak
Thicksay, is a National Conference MP in the Rajya Sabha.
But Muslims of Leh district from Turtuk to Chechoot oppose the
demand. The recently-formed Leh Muslim Coordination Committee
(LMCC) voiced its protest against the demand during Mr. K.C.
Pant's visit here in June last. ``Unfortunately the media played
up the LBA demand,'' says Mr. Mohammad Shafi Lassu, LMCC
chairman. Even the people of Kargil district are opposed to the
UT demand. Haji Abdul Qadir, councillor from Turtuk in the LAHDC,
echoes the view saying there is no question of separation from
Jammu and Kashmir.
An agitation is planned in Kargil against ``the manipulation by
one community (Buddhists) which is being trusted by powers in
Delhi''. (Kargil had rejected the idea of Hill Council when it
came into existence in Leh in 1995.)
The two representative bodies in the district - the Imam Khumaini
Memorial Trust (IKMT) and the Islamia School - object to the view
that the UT demand is those of the majority people from the
Ladakh region. The Ladakh MP, Mr. Hassan Khan, has repeatedly
said the demand is confined to a particular community.
Mr. Asghar Karbalahi, IKMT vice-chairman, has said that despite
Muslims being in the majority, Ladakh has been sending a Muslim
to Parliament only since 1989.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Maintaining the sanctity of LoC Next : Jayalalithaa cancels trip | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|