|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Unionists lukewarm to IRA offer
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, AUG 7. The IRA's ``historic'' move on decommissioning has
been shot down by Unionists pouring cold water on hopes of an
early breakthrough in Northern Ireland's deadlocked peace
process.
Expectations were raised after the IRA on Monday announced that
it was prepared to start a ``process'' leading to the destruction
of its weapons - a move welcomed by the British and Irish
Governments and grudgingly greeted even by sceptics. But the
Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) chief, Mr. David Trimble, whose party
holds the key to a settlement, today ruled out any compromise
with Republicans in the absence of a firm time-table for
decommissioning. He said he wanted to see decommissioning
actually start in order to be convinced that the IRA was serious
about it. ``We are glad to see that the IRA has taken a
significant step towards decommissioning, but it hasn't begun
decommissioning. We want to see that happen,'' he said.
Mr. Trimble, who is under pressure from his own party hawks to
take a hardline, told the BBC that similar assurances by the IRA
in the past had led to nothing. Twice, his party had gone into
government with Sinn Fein on the basis of expectations that the
IRA would start decommissioning but ``on both occasions we were
let down''. His statement came ahead of a crucial meeting of his
party legislators at which he was expected to face some tough
questions. The party is believed to be evenly divided between
moderates and hardliners with the latter often ending up pushing
the agenda.
Mr. Jeffrey Donaldson, a leading party hawk, dismissed the IRA
move as a ``pre-cooked deal'' between the British Government and
Republicans. He said the main issue was whether the IRA was going
to start decommissioning and when. Mr. Donaldson, who is seen as
a challenger to Mr. Trimble in the leadership struggle, has
enough clout in the party to swing opinion and it was he and his
fellow hawks who forced Mr. Trimble to resign as head of the
provincial Government last month plunging the peace process into
a crisis.
Republicans were predictably dismayed by the Unionists' reaction,
and the Sinn Fein leader, Mr. Gerry Adams mocked Mr. Trimble for
``pocketing'' what he termed as the IRA's ``historic
initiative''. Among those who accused the Unionists of looking
the gift horse in the mouth was Mr. Albert Reynolds, a former
Irish Prime Minister and one of the architects of the Good Friday
Agreement. He told the BBC's Newsnight that under the Agreement,
the issue of decommissioning was to be sorted out between the IRA
and the international weapons inspection body headed by Gen. John
de Chastelain and now that Gen. de Chastelain had confirmed the
authenticity of the IRA move, there was no reason to doubt it.
How decommissioning was to be done should be left to be decided
by the General in consultation with the IRA and political parties
should stay out of it. He also pointed out that handing over
weapons or their destruction in the presence of Unionists was
never envisaged in the Good Friday Agreement. The decommissioning
was to be a process - and it was to be left to the de Chastelain
commission to handle it. Gen. de Chastelain said he believed that
the IRA's proposal ``initiates a process that will put IRA arms
completely and verifiably beyond use''.
The Guardian, meanwhile, claimed that decommissioning could start
``within the next month'' and that international arms inspectors
would testify to having been present while IRA weapons were
``destroyed before their very eyes''. It said these two moves
should answer Unionists' ``anxieties'' on the timing and method
of decommissioning and if they still remained dissatisfied, then
there would be a question mark over their commitment to ``the
very idea of power-sharing, as enshrined in the Good Friday
Agreement.'' The Times was less enthusiastic saying that
Unionists were justified in demanding a ``reliable timetable''
for decommissioning. What the Republicans had offered was a
``route map'' but ``buying a map does not mean one has set out on
a journey''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Japan to work for elimination of n-arms Next : Khatami investiture today | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|