|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Bumbling on from one faux pas to another
By J.S.Ifthekhar
HYDERABAD, AUG. 7. Once bitten twice shy. This can be true in
anyone else's case, but not the Municipal Corporation of
Hyderabad (MCH). The civic body loves to err and err unabashedly.
For its recent faux pas in pulling down part of the Chowmohalla
Palace, a listed heritage building, the Corporation has drawn
severe strictures from the Heritage Conservation Committee. The
MCH has been asked to "restore" the old position of the palace.
The 14-member Committee, which met here on Tuesday, took serious
note of the dismantling of the small portion of the structure
abutting the compound wall of the Palace on Khilwat road in the
old city. The MCH action has evoked sharp reaction from several
quarters. Even the Chief Minister, Mr. N. Chandrababu Naidu,
couldn't help expressing his displeasure.
The Heritage Committee, which is constituted by the HUDA to keep
a watch on heritage buildings, asked the MCH to explain its
action. Syed Omer Jaleel, Officer on Special Duty, Charminar
Pedestrianisation Project, made a presentation on the ongoing
road widening programme in the old city with the help of slides.
The Committee also took into account the report given by Mr. S.P.
Shorey, OSD, who earlier inspected the demolished portion.
The Committee members are unanimous in their view that the
structure demolished is part of the Chowmohalla Palace. They are
stated to be upset that the MCH had gone ahead and dismantled the
hoary structure without even consulting them. Under the amended
Rule 13 of the A.P. Urban Development Act, no one - neither the
Government nor a private owner, can tamper with a heritage
building without the prior permission of the Heritage Committee.
Even the colour combination of a heritage structure cannot be
changed without the permission of the Committee. What surprised
the Committee is the casual way the MCH treated the Chowmohalla
Palace which the Government is planning to showcase as a tourist
spot.
Worried about the possible threat to other heritage structures,
the Committee has asked the MCH not to "tinker with" any such
edifice without first consulting it. "We will forward our views
to the HUDA which in turn will write to the Corporation to
restore the demolished portion", Mr. Shravan Kumar, former Chief
Secretary and Chairman, Heritage Conservation Committee, told The
Hindu.
This is not the first time that the MCH has acted brazenly with
regard to heritage buildings. It raised the hackles of
conservationists when the compound wall of the St. Georges Church
at Abids was pulled down two years ago as part of the road
widening programme. Then also the Heritage Committee had to step
in and direct the Corporation to restore the compound wall.
The MCH contention is that the demolished portion is outside the
Chowmohalla palace and its removal is necessary to save the
compound wall of the place. But under the law even compound wall
and open area form part of heritage precincts and nothing can be
touched without the permission of the Heritage Committee.
Will the MCH keep its hands off heritage buildings - at least
now?
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : New facilities at airport Next : Painful end to 'Srinivas' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|