|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
T.N. silent on Centre's proposal to transfer CJ
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, AUG. 12. The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, Ms.
Jayalalithaa, once again appears to have got the better of the
Centre in the battle of nerves the NDA Government has initiated
against her since the fateful events of June 30.
Pursuing a strategy to leave Ms. Jayalalithaa stranded in a
quagmire of legal entanglements, the Centre seems to have decided
to effect a change of guard at the Madras High Court.
Accordingly, the incumbent Chief Justice, Mr. Justice N.K. Jain,
is to be transferred to the Karnataka High Court and a senior
Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court is to be promoted as the
Chief Justice of the Madras High Court. As per the existing
conventions, the Centre does not need the consent of a Chief
Minister before transferring out a Chief Justice; however, the
Centre feels it is obliged to hold ``consultations'' with the
Chief Minister before posting a Chief Justice in his or her
State.
The Centre (the Union Law Ministry, after consultation and
consent of the Chief Justice of India) is believed to have
written about 12 days ago to the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister in the
matter of posting a new Chief Justice. It is pointed out that
while the Centre is not bound to accept the views of a Chief
Minister, nonetheless it is obliged to go through the motion of
``consultation.''
Rather cleverly, Ms. Jayalalithaa has neither said `no' nor `yes'
to the Centre's proposal. The Centre cannot even overrule Ms.
Jayalalithaa unless it receives a reply from her. The Centre
seems to be at a loss as to how long it can wait to hear from St.
Fort George.
On the face of it, all this may seem somewhat innocuous. Yet,
sources here and in Chennai suggest that the Centre's thinking
was - and is - motivated by a desire to close as many doors of
legal relief for Ms. Jayalalithaa as possible. In particular, the
move to transfer Chief Justice Jain was aimed at ensuring that
Ms. Jayalalithaa's appeal in the Tansi case did not get posted
before a ``friendly'' judge. The tactics appear to have paid off
as the appeal is now listed before a new judge.
As it is, the Centre feels that the Chief Minister is using her
incumbency to turn the legal tide in her favour; and, the idea is
to have a Chief Justice who, in the Centre's view, would be firm
and fair.
Somehow, the Centre has come to entertain doubts about the
incumbent Chief Justice; for example, there was stout opposition
to the idea that the Chief Justice could be asked - as per the
normal practice - to officiate after Ms. Fatima Beevi was
unseated as the Governor. So much so, the Governor of Andhra
Pradesh was asked to hold concurrent charge of Chennai's Raj
Bhavan.
Perhaps aware of the Centre's designs, Ms. Jayalalithaa is
believed to have opted to sit pretty on the communication from
New Delhi, waiting for the NDA regime to show its hand first.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : India-China talks on western sector soon Next : Jaswant to visit China in Oct. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|