|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
State's resistance on the wane
By P. Venugopal
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, AUG. 12. Kerala's resistance to the Central
policy initiatives under the globalisation-liberalisation
philosophy is clearly on the wane.
This is evident from the UDF Government's decision to sign a
memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Union Government on
issues relating to reforms in the power sector. The
conditionalities to which the State seems to be committing itself
while negotiating loans from institutions like the Asian
Development Bank (ADB) also bring out this weakening resistance.
For the better or the worse, the State is fast being drawn into
the whirlpool of the emerging economic milieu where success or
downfall will depend on the ability to compete in a global
environment. The previous LDF Government in the State had been
trying to swim against the tide of the globalisation-
liberalisation initiatives of the Centre.
The best example of the previous Government's unwillingness to
fall in line with the Centre's dictates on the policy front was
the approach it adopted in the power sector. The State, when the
LDF was in power, had not set up a Tariff Regulatory Commission,
as stipulated by the Central Electricity Act, and also to split
the State Electricity Board into three independent business
entities dealing with generation, transmission and distribution
of power.
The argument against the Tariff Regulatory Commission was that
the decision on fixing power tariff should ideally be made by the
Government itself, which is directly accountable to the people
who had elected it to office and not by an independent body,
which might deal with the subject strictly on business
principles.
The LDF had opposed the very spirit of the Central Electricity
Act, arguing that it was designed as a tool to facilitate
privatisation of the power sector in the country. The Nayanar
government had also voiced its concern over the ``hidden agenda''
behind the Centre's decision to institute a special fund to
provide incentives to the States which complied with the
stipulations from New Delhi. This `special fund' was perceived as
a `trap' by the Nayanar Government.
Whatever be the defects of the power policy pursued by the
previous Government, Kerala witnessed a record jump in its
generation capacity during its term. Though the KSEB's finances
are now a shambles, with its monthly revenue deficit touching
nearly Rs. 160 crores, many other States which had gone ahead
with the power reforms are in a worse situation. Some of the
States which are uncomfortable with the Centre's coercive
approach to reforms in power sector have even started taking a
closer look at the `Kerala pattern of power reforms'.
However, the UDF Government has now clearly indicated its
intention to give up its predecessor's experiment at an alternate
power policy by declaring that it was ready to sign a memorandum
of understanding with the Centre on the reforms to be undertaken
in the sector. The Tariff Regulatory Commission is also being set
up in the State, as stipulated by the Central Electricity Act.
Top officials of the State Government are proceeding to Manila
this week to negotiate a loan from the ADB for supporting fiscal
reforms in the State. A contact mission of the ADB had, in June,
visited the State for preliminary discussions with the Chief
Minister, other Ministers and State Government officials on the
subject of this assistance.
The `aide memoire' of the ADB Mission, sent to the Government
after these initial discussions, mentions about a series of `next
steps' to be taken by the State as a pre- condition for getting
the loan. One of these steps relates to converting the policy
measures `being' proposed in the White Paper on State Finances,
brought out by the UDF Government, into a draft policy matrix
``which should be shared with the ADB staff''.
Another step proposed by the ADB is to establish a public
finance review committee, as ``envisaged'' during the
discussions. This committee should be chaired by an eminent
``independent'' public finance expert.
Both these conditionalities seem to indicate the desire of the
financing institution to have a direct say in the formulation of
the future policies of the State Government. Also, interestingly,
the White Paper, the general drift of which finds mention in the
`aide memoire' of the ADB Mission, was only under preparation at
the time of the mission's visit to Thiruvananthapuram in the
first week of June, this year.
Referring to the power sector in the State, the document speaks
about ``more radical reform options for the State Electricity
Board, similar to those being implemented by States which have
undertaken major power sector reforms...'' The mission recommends
that the State Government ``intensify its dialogue with the ADB
and with the Government of India on policy options for reform''.
The big question now is: Who is deciding Kerala's policies?
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : IBM eServer breaks Internet speed record Next : Arrears to Govt. contractors mount to Rs. 1,300 cr. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|