|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Judge didn't err in appointing commissioner for airport: Bench
By Our Staff Reporter
CHENNAI, AUG. 12. The Madras High Court has upheld a single judge
order appointing an Advocate Commissioner to make enquiries about
improvement of passenger amenities at the International airport
here.
Disposing of an appeal filed by the Airports Authority of India
(AAI), a division bench comprising Mr. Justice V. S. Sirpurkar
and Mr. Justice B. Akbar Basha Khadiri said the single judge had
not committed any error in appointing the Commissioner.
``After all, the Advocate Commissioner is not to act as some
superior authority of the Airport Authority. He will only be a
fact-finding machine and will assist the court in knowing what
the actual situation is.''
The original complainant, Dr. K. M. Cherian, said that despite
Chennai being a medical centre of repute hosting a number of
international conferences, the amenities at the airport were far
from satisfactory.
Dr. Cherian wanted the AAI authorities directed to strictly
comply with the provisions of the International Airports
Authority Act 1971 and take effective steps to implement the Act
for the betterment of the airport on all fronts.
Even air-conditioners and conveyor belts were not in proper
working condition, thereby delaying passenger clearance, he said.
On December 22, 2000, the single judge observed that the petition
could not be dismissed in limine (admission stage), nor could it
be allowed straight away. He appointed Mr. R. Sudhakar, Advocate
Commissioner, to enquire into the allegations.
But the AAI challenged the appointment, saying it was not
justified.
The bench said every person had a fundamental right to know how
the government machinery worked.
Leaving the decision on the merits or demerits of the allegations
to the single judge, the Bench said he was justified in
appointing the official. It also extended by six weeks the time
given to the Advocate Commissioner.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : 'DMK mismanagement cost STC Rs. 2500 cr.' Next : SAF Games village: No pride for these owners | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|