|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
South Asia sanctions policy under review: U.S.
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, AUG. 14. The U.S. State Department has reiterated
that the Bush administration ``is currently reviewing policy on
South Asia sanctions'' and examining the broader use of sanctions
as a diplomatic tool.
``... that review continues to be ongoing. It is a complex
area,'' the deputy spokesman, Mr. Philip Reeker, said on Monday.
And on the issue of sanctions, he said, ``no decisions have been
taken on the changes that would involve consultations with the
Congress. That is a very important aspect of all this.''
In the course of the general discussion of the punitive measures
against India and Pakistan, the Administration points out that
what are in place are the post-1998 Glenn Amendment sanctions and
the earlier nuclear-related sanctions under the Pressler and the
Symington Amendments.
What is also being said in terms of the ``South Asia sanctions''
is that a separate review policy is currently under way for both
India and Pakistan.
Over the weekend, The Washington Post ran a front page story
which said that the Bush Administration is seeking an early
lifting of sanctions against India and is working with the
Congress for the same.
The Deputy Secretary of State, Mr. Richard Armitage, had made the
point that progress in easing the sanctions against India would
be made ``at a speed visible to the naked eye'' when lawmakers
return from their recess in the first week of September.
The State Department has said that this meant ``movement''.
``Lifting of nuclear-related sanctions would have less impact on
Pakistan as it is also subject to sanctions under the Foreign
Assistance Act because of the October 1999 coup,'' Mr. Reeker
said, adding that these sanctions can only be lifted on a
Presidential certification that a democratically-elected
Government has taken office in Pakistan.
The Republican Administration has made it known that it is for
pursuing the framework of relations put in place by the Clinton
Administration.
Washington knows that the sanctions are an irritant in bilateral
relations; and at the same time has made it known that it is not
for side-stepping Capitol Hill in the process.
While key Republicans like the Senator, Mr. Sam Brownback, have
been urging for the lifting of sanctions fully, Democratic
Senators like Mr. Joseph Biden are asking different questions. It
is not that the lawmakers like Mr. Biden are against expanding
the canvas of relationship with India; rather they want to know
if the overall objectives of American non- proliferation agenda
have been met fully.
It remains to be seen if the Republican Administration would go
beyond the Glenn Amendment sanctions which would then give a
larger meaning to future bilateral relations.
A compelling argument has been made that for the U.S.' relations
with India to change in breadth and width, Washington will also
have to pay very close and immediate attention to the existing
pre-1998 measures.
Pak. caution
PTI reports from Islamabad:
Pakistan has cautioned the U.S. that any favour towards India
alone in lifting of sanctions, would affect the efforts to
improve relations between Islamabad and Washington.
Addressing the Pakistan-American Congress last week- end in
Washington, the Pakistan Ambassador to the U.S., Ms. Maleeha
Lodhi, said while New Delhi faced only one layer of sanctions,
Islamabad has been subjected to five layers of sanctions, the
Pakistan official APP news agency reported.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Minister meets LTTE cadres Next : IRA withdraws offer to decommission arms | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|