|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
IRA withdraws offer to decommission arms
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, AUG 14. Weeks of efforts to revive the Northern Ireland
peace process were in a shambles today after the Irish Republican
Army (IRA) withdrew its offer to decommission its arms, accusing
the Unionists and the British Government of putting hurdles in
the way of peace-keeping which, it said, required a ``collective
effort''.
The announcement came amid embarrassment within IRA's own ranks
following the arrest on Monday of three suspected IRA terrorists
in Colombia on the charge of training a guerilla group allegedly
in exchange for arms. Their arrest was seized by Unionists to
question the IRA's commitment to the peace process and the
credibility of its much-publicised offer to get rid of its
weapons in return for concessions on policing and security.
As the news of the arrests came, a senior Unionist leader said
the Republican commitment to the Good Friday Agreement would be
``seriously if not fatally undermined'' by the development.
Analysts said the Republicans' capacity to convince the Unionists
that it was sincere about destroying its weapons had been
seriously compromised by reports that the three IRA terrorists
arrested in Colombia were scouting for arms. The IRA's decision
to withdraw its offer was seen as a clever tactic to pre-empt
attacks on its credibility. ``Before the Unionists could say that
we have no trust in your offer after what happened in Colombia,
IRA withdrew it on its own'', one commentator said but
acknowledged the political impact of having the door formally
slammed on the current peace efforts.
Mr. Jeffrey Donaldson, a hardline Ulster Unionist Party (UUP)
M.P., termed the IRA's announcement as a ``massive blow to the
peace process'' saying the IRA had, in fact, never completely
given up violence and only the level of terrorism had come down.
He said the arms procurement mission of its men in Colombia was
inconsistent with the IRA's talk of decommissioning. Another UUP
leader denounced the IRA move as a ``political stunt'' and an
attempt to put more pressure on the British Government to concede
its demands on policing and security. Mr. Peter Robinson of the
anti-agreement Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) demanded that the
Government withdraw the ``concessions'' it had made to the
Republicans in recent weeks.
Unionists, cutting across party affiliations, believed that the
developments in Colombia had raised serious questions about the
Republicans' commitment to decommissioning. It seemed that even
as one arm of the Republicans was talking about decommissioning,
another was busy acquiring arms. The IRA's announcement did not
come as a surprise after Republicans had hinted such a move on
Monday. The offer, which now stands withdrawn, was made last week
and according to it, the IRA was said to be discussing with the
independent decommissioning body a method to put its weapons
``completely and verifiably beyond use''.
The head of the decommissioning body, Gen. de Chastelain had
expressed support for the move, but the Unionists turned it down
saying similar assurances had been given in the past, only to be
broken. They insisted that physical destruction of weapons must
start before they agree to return to the power-sharing coalition
which they quit last month when Mr. David Trimble resigned as its
head.
The Republicans were furious, and their fury was compounded when
the British Government, despite their opposition, suspended the
Provincial Assembly at the weekend to buy time until Sept. 23 to
get the two sides to reach an agreement. They said it was an
attempt to pressure them and they would not succumb to it.
The IRA, in a statement this morning, said its offer of August 8
was aimed at ``advancing the peace process'' but its ``outright
rejection'' by Unionists ``compounded by the setting of
preconditions are totally unacceptable''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : South Asia sanctions policy under review: U.S. Next : Mood grim in Skopje despite pact | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|