|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
Speculation as Gore surfaces after hibernation
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
SAN FRANCISCO, AUG 14. For some time now, there has been media
speculation on the political future of the former Vice-President,
Mr. Al Gore. After dropping out of sight for the last six months,
the former Vice-President ``surfaced'' again this week only for
columnists to start the game all over again - is Mr. Gore testing
the waters, and if so, will the Democrats rally behind the person
who many believe was ``cheated'' last November?
The Gore phenomenon in the political spectrum and within the
Democratic Party cuts many ways. First, there are those within
the party who believe that he was given a shoddy deal last
November; that he was virtually denied the Presidency in spite of
having won the popular vote.
Second, there are those in the Democratic party who are outraged
that the former Vice-President simply threw away the election
which was his by any stretch of imagination given what was going
for him, the party and the country thanks to the former
President, Mr. Bill Clinton. Third, there are Democrats and those
on the outside who question Mr. Gore's belief that he could pull
off an election without Mr. Clinton. To an extent, that was true
of many Democrats too - those in the party who wanted the ``big
man'' for his fund-raising abilities but did not want to be
associated with Mr. Clinton on the personal front.
And fourthly, the question for Mr. Gore now - can he still make a
comeback in the party, patch up with pro-Clinton Democrats
without coming to terms with the former President himself?
Whether Mr. Gore and his supporters like it or not, Mr. Clinton
is indeed a major factor within the party and is someone who
still has fund-raising muscle. The Clinton phenomenon aside, the
big problem for the former Vice-President is the other contenders
within the party who may not feel any great obligation to give
Mr. Gore another shot at the Presidency. The Democratic
contenders have not yet come out in the open but it is not too
hard to fathom who may be interested for 2004.
At least 10 names are floating around, many of whom will be taken
seriously even if questions are raised on their fund-raising
abilities which is critical to get through the long campaign
season. And every one of the names that have cropped up and the
ones that will be coming up from between now and the
electioneering time of 2004 will be problematic for Mr. Gore. The
one exception, according to media reports, is that Mr. Joseph
Lieberman, the running mate of Mr. Gore last November, will not
be inclined to stay in the ``race'' should the former Vice-
President decide to seek the party ticket again. Ms. Tipper Gore
apparently does not want her husband to throw his hat in the
Presidential ring again.
Whether it is Mr. Gore, Mr. Richard Gephardt, the House Minority
Leader, Mr. Tom Daschle, the Senate Majority Leader, Senator John
Kerry of Massachussets, Senator John Edwards of North Carolina,
Senator Joseph Biden of Delaware or the California Governor, Mr.
Gray Davis, the party must throw its weight wholeheartedly behind
a team in the final showdown.
Democrats eyeing the Presidency in 2004 will not start their
campaign openly now. The testing of the waters will crystallise
into something more concrete once the off-year Congressional
elections are out of the way in November 2002.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Mood grim in Skopje despite pact | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|