|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Alleged breach of norms in Govt. Pleader postings
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, AUG. 14. The KC(J) general secretary, Mr.
P.C. George, MLA, has alleged gross violation of norms and denial
of opportunity to Dalits in the appointment of Government
Pleaders.
Mr. George told a news conference here today that the Government
had also mislead the High Court about the Cabinet decision on
appointment of Pleaders. He accused the Law Minister, Mr. K.M.
Mani, of having misused his powers to make these appointments and
demanded his resignation for having failed to do justice to all
sections in the election of Government Pleaders.
The Government had initially appointed eight Pleaders. On August
2, the Cabinet selected 23 persons as Government Pleaders and 25
as Senior Government Pleaders. Newspapers reported this on August
3 listing the names of the chosen persons. Following this a
public interest petition was filed before the High Court alleging
breach of norms in the choice of Government Pleaders.
Arguing on behalf of the Government, the Additional Advocate
General told the court that eight of the persons mentioned in the
news reports had not been appointed. But the fact of the matter
was that the Government had just deferred giving posting orders
to the persons concerned. That being so, it was a clear case of
misrepresentation of facts by the Government before the court,
Mr. George said.
The KC(J) leader pointed out that under the Kerala Government
Law Officers Appointment and Conditions of Service and Conduct of
Cases Rules, at least two out of every 10 Government Pleaders
should belong to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes and those
being appointed as Government Pleaders and Senior Government
Pleaders should have practised in the High Court for three and
five years respectively. But among those appointed by the UDF
Government, there were persons who had never appeared before the
High Court, who started practice in the High Court just a few
months ago and even some who had come from the Gulf to take up
the appointment.
The list of 56 should have contained at least 12 Dalits. By
denying the Dalits their rightful share of representation, the
Antony Government has breached the Constitutional guarantees and
betrayed the Dalits. If Mr. Mani was not willing to step down on
his own, the Chief Minister should divest him of the Law
portfolio and make the appointments afresh adhering to the
relevant norms, Mr. George said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : MT to head Kalamandalam Next : 'Canal Walk' sparks off a row in Corpn. Council | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|