|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Beyond employee satisfaction
By N. N. Sachitanand
BANGALORE, AUG. 19. The acquisition, fostering and retention of
talent is a matter of concern for organisations operating in
today's competitive world. To address the above issue, a common
practice is to conduct employee satisfaction surveys and evolve
personnel policies based on the feedback. The belief has been
that whatever enhanced employee satisfaction would accentuate
employee commitment and performance and by extension boost the
welfare of the organisation.
This, says eminent HR practitioner, Mr. Ashok Malhotra, is a
delusion. Employee satisfaction is not the sole determinant of
employee commitment. The latter has diverse and dynamic triggers.
In fact, the more relevant question is not how committed is the
individual alone, but what is the nature of commitment, the
ground from which it springs and the object of his commitment.
According to Mr. Malhotra, who is the Chairman of the Chennai-
based Ma Foi Management Consultants, commitment is a process that
is generated in the interface between the collective psyche, the
organisation identity and the organisation leadership. What
individuals and groups commit to, the nature and strength of
their commitment and the implications for overall organisational
health flow from the dynamics of this interface.
Ma Foi has now come out with a framework called EmPACT to
understand and reflect on the diverse pulls and pressures between
the three constituents mentioned above and the nature of
commitment that they foster among members. EmPACT's accent is on
holism and the study is concerned with understanding the
particular and simultaneously its interplay with the whole.
An EmPACT roll out study is preceded by a strong organisation
sensing exercise. To start with, this would appear to be a
typical employee opinion survey, with some key differences,
namely:
Employee opinions/perceptions are taken and treated as such -
perceptions - no more, no less;
The `collective' profile - psychographic and demographic - to
understand the pulls of the collective psyche is deemed more
important;
The organisation identity is mapped as a distinct component as is
the leadership identity;
Data analysis, an off-site activity done by the EmPACT
consultants.
This is then followed by a workshop involving the keynote persons
in the organisation. The workshop is a crucial step in the EmPACT
study as it is a platform to:
Share data, analysis and interpretations
Identify the entrenchments/dysfunctional elements that impact the
individual - organisation interface;
Understand the planks of commitment that different groups within
the organisation seem to operate from;
Identify the points of leverage that the organisation can build
upon; and
Create a path forward.
Thus, as Mr. Ashok Malhotra points out, an EmPACT study does not
impose the consultant's solutions. It is the keynote members of
the organisation such as the top management and the employee
association leaders, participating in the workshop, who decide
upon the action plans based on the data analysis presented by the
consultants.
According to Mr. K. Pandia Rajan, Managing Director of Ma Foi,
EmPACT studies have already been initiated in a few large
organisations in India.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Common strands in today's controversies Next : ICICI's third public offer of bonds | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|