|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
DDA tried to 'sidetrack' MLAs
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, AUG. 19.
The Delhi Development Authority's failure to hold a meeting for
more than two months has led to strong resentment among its
members who are alleging that ``attempts are being made to
marginalise the elected representatives''.
``No meeting of the Authority has been held for the past two
months. A number of important decisions are being taken without
the DDA's permission which is in violation of its rules and
regulations,'' rued the Congress(I) MLA, Mr. Mahabal Mishra.
Arguing that DDA meeting should normally be held at least once a
month, Mr. Mishra said: ``Officials are trying to bypass us. We
cannot be mute spectators to all the wrong that is being
committed in DDA right now.'' Incidentally, the Delhi Lieutenant-
Governor, Mr. Vijai Kapoor, is also the chairman of DDA.
He alleged that DDA meeting was deliberately not being held as
officials feared that the elected members would raise a number of
serious issues of corruption and malpractice going on in DDA.
``Not only crores of rupees of public money is being misutilised,
but even smaller and basic things are in a mess,'' he charged.
They could not handle simple things like dispatch and receipt of
letters, which results in inconvenience to the common man, and
becomes a breeding ground for corruption. ``Due to this, the DDA
is facing more than 3,000 court cases and over 10,000 grievances.
No attempt has been made so far to tackle such an important issue
like this,'' Mr. Mishra alleged.
The Congress(I) MLA asserted that DDA was fleecing the public and
has been charging extra money from them. Several thousands of
applications for conversion from leasehold to freehold are still
pending even 23 months after the expiry of this special scheme.
``Those people whose applications are being disposed of now are
forced to pay an additional money due to recent increase in the
Stamp Duty. Why should people pay for the inordinate delay by
DDA? It should be paid by DDA?'' he demanded.
Another DDA Member and the BJP MLA, Mr. Puran Chand Yogi, --
eagerly awaiting the Authority meeting initially scheduled to be
held on August 13, but cancelled later -- is a disappointed man.
``I was planning to raise a number of important issues at
the meeting. There are certain important issues which need to be
immediately taken up at Authority level. But it seems officials
are afraid of facing the elected members,'' he observed.
Mr. Yogi alleged even simple procedures had been complicated by
the DDA. ``There are number of rules and regulations, besides
quite a few forms, which need to be immediately done away with.
These only help breed corruption. The way officials are reluctant
to remove these lacunas, shows that there is something fishy,''
he said.
Both Mr. Mishra and Mr. Yogi alleged they have received no
reports on the several scams including ``watch-and-ward'' and
``medical bill'' scam, despite promises in this regard at the
last meeting of the Authority. ``No action has been taken so far
in this regard,'' they said.
Senior DDA officials, however, maintained that there was no
deliberate postponement of Authority meeting. ``In fact, there
are not enough items on agenda. There is no point in calling the
Authority meeting just for the sake of it,'' the official
defended.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Husband held for Rajni's killing Next : Impressive turnout for Cong. rally | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|