|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, August 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
Caste discrimination is racism?
"CASTE DISCRIMINATION is racism'' - this is the contention of all
the NGOs working for the dalit cause. Hence their coordinated
effort for its inclusion in the Durban conference. One fails to
understand how sociologists are silent on this argument, namely
making the dalit discrimination a racist discrimination. There is
no quarrel on the fact that dalits have been and are
discriminated but simply because a global forum will give greater
world focus one cannot intermix sociological facts. NGOs get
enormous funds for both women and dalit causes. These are two
perennial money drawing sources for the NGOs and hence they unite
on this, to catch the world attention and boost the funding
prospects.
What is race and what is caste? These are two different
sociological constructs which cannot be one and the same no
matter what the NGOs say or want. A simple question is to which
race do the Vanniars belong? To which race do the Pallars belong?
For that matter all the so called upper castes in Tamil Nadu, to
be more specific, belong to the Dravidian race; so too are the
SCs. Discrimination again is inflicted on the SCs not by the
upper castes alone; within the SCs, the subsect the Pariyars is
the most discriminated by the other subsects. Hence the former is
doubly discriminated. Yet there is no special focus on this. By
lumpening discrimination of the SCs, the discrimination within
the SCs subsects has been largely overlooked. Similarly, the
benefits and the concessions given to the SCs are mostly cornered
by the upper subsects of the SCs. Discrimination, apart from
being a violation of human rights, is also poignant when one
realises that it is by the same race against the same race.
Cultural barriers
Historically citing occupation varna, mythology,
conqueror/conquered, etc., whatever came handy was accepted to
rationalise and justify the discrimination and exploitation
system. Religious sanctions abetted and reinforced the
perpetuation of this oppressive system. Society was thus
hierarchically stratified with proscriptive and prescriptive
norms. Fenced in by endogamy these segments of society became
watertight compartments and suited the hierarchical upper
segments of society. But this all happened within the same race
of people. With the kind of occupation assigned to the SCs, and
the denial of education, cultural barriers also arose. While the
upper castes had the benefits of education and were quick to
assimilate westernisation and modernisation those who were
oppressed were forced to continue to live under the oppressive
yoke. This is historically true.
Sanskritisation
A phenomenon which M. N. Srinivas termed as `Sanskritisation', a
process by which the upward mobility was sought by the so called
backward castes in the caste hierarchy. It has also led to they
becoming the immediate oppressors of the dalits. Today one can
see this process of Sanskritisation among the Pallars too. This
was possible because of the gradual empowerment process -
political power, land ownership and government jobs. It is not
uncommon to discover a `puja' room in a Pallar's house. This
upper sect of the SCs is adopting the brahminisation of rites and
rituals and all religious functions. The point I want to make is
that the process of Sanskritisation seems to be confined mostly
among the Pallars - a definite sign of empowerment and mobility.
It seems to me that a whole range of historical facts and
processes cannot be buried to suit the myopic perception and
vested interests of NGOs and shuffle `caste discrimination' under
race discrimination. True that dalit rights are human rights -
all rights in the world are human rights and any denial of rights
needs to be fought against and eliminated. This cannot be
achieved by using wrong premises and constructs and by putting
caste discrimination under an entirely different category. The
historical and cultural background of discrimination, its
evolution, the structures which upheld it, the methods of
perpetuation, the religious sanctions, etc., are essential for
working towards its effective elimination. The move to push it
under `race' may serve the NGOs but will not serve the dalit
cause. It may bring some global publicity and more funds. But I
am afraid it will help the violators to get away with
discrimination. This `spread' will also dilute the focus. Caste
discrimination will continue because there are many vested
interests enmeshed within the dalit issue - be they the
politicians and/or the NGOs. It brings money and power. That the
dalits are today a power to be reckoned with cannot be denied and
I am confident that they will within the framework of the
country's polity assert their constitutional rights as citizens
of this country belonging to the same race.
HILDA RAJA
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Management of plastic waste | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|