|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, August 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Home Ministry to probe if Tehelka violated law
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, AUG. 23. The Government today told Parliament that the
Union Home Ministry would hold an inquiry into whether the news
portal tehelka.com had violated the law in conducting its sting
operation, and that ``strong action'' would be taken against it,
if found guilty.
The Government's response came at the end of an impromptu
discussion in the Lok Sabha on newspaper reports that the news
portal had adopted ``immoral and illegal methods'' to expose
corruption in defence deals. The Parliamentary Affairs Minister,
Mr. Pramod Mahajan, said, ``while journalists have every right to
gather news, they cannot do it by breaking the law, no one
including MPs or journalists is above the law, and if it is found
that they broke the rules strong action will be taken against
them.''
For the second successive day, the Lok Sabha witnessed angry
scenes on the alleged use of women as ``honeytraps'' by
tehelka.com in its bid to expose corruption in defence deals.
Both the Opposition and the Government used the opportunity to
reiterate their positions. The Opposition led by the Congress
renewed the demand for a JPC probe into the issue of corruption
and the ``reprehensible and abhorrent'' means adopted by the
portal. Mr. Mahajan, in his response, sought to give a clean chit
to the former Defence Minister, Mr. George Fernandes, saying ``in
my opinion he is innocent though it will be finally decided by
the Justice Venkataswami Commission''.
The issue was raised by the former Prime Minister, Mr. S. Chandra
Shekhar, who accused the portal of adopting ``immoral and
undignified means'' to get information. The portal's actions
would lower the nation's prestige. ``How is it a national duty,
when it defames and lowers the nation's prestige?''
'Reprehensible means'
In a forceful presentation, the Congress Deputy Leader, Mr.
Madhavrao Scindia, called for a JPC to probe the ``operation''
and punish those involved in corruption, as well the
``reprehensible'' means adopted by tehelka.com. He, however,
pointed out that the ``abhorrent means'' adopted by the portal
should not be used as an excuse to ``obliterate the revelations
on corruption and the involvement of some very important and
powerful people shown on video earlier''.
Mr. Scindia was supported by the CPI(M)'s Mr. Somnath Chatterjee,
who described the manner of disclosure as ``objectionable'' and
said the Government was welcome to take any action as permitted
by the law. But he came down heavily on the defence personnel
involved in corruption and shown on video; ``what about those who
fell into the trap and breached national security''.
The Samata party's Mr. Prabhunath Singh and Mr. Brahmanand Mandal
alleged that ``sting operation'' was part of a conspiracy to
destabilise the nation and called for the arrest of the
journalists involved. Mr. Mandal blamed the Congress for
instigating tehelka.com into carry out the operation.
Furore in RS
In the Rajya Sabha, the attempts by Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Singh
`Lallan' (Samata), to raise the issue through a special mention
resulted in a furore and a brief adjournment before lunch. The
Opposition members led by the Congress objected to the mentioning
of a newspaper's name even as the BJP members joined the issue.
While the Samata member swiftly agreed to drop naming the paper,
the Congress members insisted that the procedural problem
remained.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Centre for in-camera proceedings | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|