|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, August 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Helms to retire at end of term
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, AUG. 23. After 30 years in the Senate, Mr. Jesse
Helms, is calling it quits in 2002. The darling of the
conservatives in the right wing and a red rag to the Liberals,
the 80-year-old Senator has cited age as the reason for his
stepping down when his current term expires in January 2003.
``I would be 88 if I ran again in 2002 and was elected and lived
to finish a sixth term. This, my family and I decided
unanimously, I should not do and... shall not'', Mr. Helms said
in a broadcast from Raleigh, North Carolina. At the same time,
the one-time powerful Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee made it clear that he was not retiring right away.
``A great deal of work lies ahead of the United States Senate
this fall and next year when there will be much significant
legislation'', the Republican Senator noted.
When Mr. Helms retires, the Republican right wing would have lost
a powerhouse on Capitol Hill, for among other things, Mr. Helms
had the uncanny knack of tying up nominations by linking the same
to further conservative causes. A powerful voice on Capitol Hill
on foreign policy, Mr. Helms' departure would also make the anti-
China lobby lose a ``dear'' friend. A relentless critic of
Beijing, Mr. Helms was seen as one of the major voices for
Taiwan, Tibet and human rights.
Mr. Helms was one of those on Capitol Hill who had called for
better relations with India keeping in mind the China and
democracy factors. He had mellowed his views on India over a
period of time and several prominent Indian Americans in North
Carolina backed him politically.
Mr. Helms was perhaps best known for his blunt foreign policy
stances, making no bones of where he stood with respect to Cuba,
Canada or the United Nations. For all his opposition to the world
body, Mr. Helms played a crucial role in the final accord on
payment of arrears to the U.N., but not before the then U.S.
Ambassador, Mr. Richard Holbrooke, worked out a reform of the
U.N. package. And recently, Mr. Helms became the first ever U.S.
Senator to address the Security Council.
The significance of Mr. Helms' departure is not in Capitol Hill
missing ``Senator No'', but in the jostling by the Republicans
and Democrats for a ``real'' majority in the Senate.
Conservatives who adored Mr. Helms for his hardline views on
anything from school prayer to the homosexual agenda see the
Senator as being hard to replace. And the Democrats and Liberals
are studying if there is an opening to have the second seat as
well from the State.
The Republicans are counting on coming up with a consensus
candidate early on so as to keep the seat in the hands of the
Grand Old Party. As many as 34 Senate seats are up for election
in 2002 - 20 Republican and 14 Democrats. And this would include
at least two open seats. The name prominently doing the rounds as
successor to Mr. Helms is that of Ms. Elizabeth Dole, a former
Cabinet member under Republican administrations, former
Chairperson of the Red Cross and wife of the former Senate
Majority Leader, Mr. Robert Dole.
With the Democrats eyeing for the best challenger in November
2002, the Republicans are anxious that a bruising primary in the
event of Mr. Lauch Faircloth - who lost his Senate seat in 1998
to Mr. John Edwards - pursuing this race will certainly not be in
the best interests of the party.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Russia warns NATO Next : Major, Thatcher in proxy battle | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|