|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, August 25, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Joshi misled Parliament, says Sahmat
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, AUG. 24. Accusing the Union Human Resource Development
Minister, Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi, of misleading Parliament by
giving false information during the debate on ``saffronisation of
education'' last Thursday, academicians today alleged that the
NDA Government was just furthering its ``hidden agenda'' in the
garb of providing ``value-based'' education.
Condemning the Union Minister for giving false information on the
floor of the House, members of Sahmat(Safdar Hashmi Memorial
Trust) today criticised the Government for communalising
education and trying to rewrite history in school books.
Reacting to the Minister's claim in Parliament that the
preparatory material for national curriculum framework for school
education was discussed with experts like Prof. Yashpal, Dr.
Arvind Kumar and Dr. Kapila Vatsyayan, the noted historian, Ms.
Romila Thapar, today said, ``From what most of these experts have
told us, they were invited to give lectures to the curriculum
group and not to take part in any discussion.
The Government seems not to be showing too much concern for
consultation.''
Addressing a press conference organised by Sahmat here, she
further questioned if ``one stops merely at consulting political
parties.
All we want to know is who are these so called historians and
academicians who are deciding what the students of this country
should or should not read and who seem to be literally rewriting
history.''
The Government's stress on providing value-based education also
came in for sharp criticism. Dr. Joshi had stated in Parliament
that ``what is required today is not religious education but
education about religions, their basics, the values inherent
therein and also a comparative study of the philosophy of all
religions''
Questioning this point of the Minister, Prof. Anil Sadagopal of
the Delhi University's Department of Education said, ``When did
we teach religion to our students over the last five decades. In
a multi-religious society like ours, where is the need.
Since when has religion become an important part of social
values. It is simply the notions of education that the Sangh
Parivar is trying to promote,'' he said.
Reacting to the Government's proposal to make Sanskrit mandatory
in all schools across the country, Prof. Sadagopal said ``The
Government may believe that Sanskrit has a universal appeal, but
it seems to me that Dr.Joshi's India is much smaller than my
India, which also includes the North-East, the Central India and
places like Tamil Nadu which has people speaking a language
perhaps as old as Sanskrit.''
Describing the recent advertisement that the University Grants
Commission had given in the Employment News for the post of
lecturer for Spoken Sanskrit, the academics alleged that while
the UGC had complained about not having enough resources for
supporting the Elementary Education course of Delhi University,
it had enough money to support subjects like Astrology and Vedic
Studies that were not based on scientific reasoning but were just
cults.
``By keeping the eligibility criteria for the lecturers as low as
a simple graduation, the UGC itself flouted basic guidelines. And
in any case, all colleges have their own selection committees, so
how can the UGC make the selections for them,'' another
academician asked.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : NGO demands Tarun Tejpal's arrest Next : Delhi HC directive to CBI on RIL 'irregularities' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|