|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Miscellaneous
| Previous
| Next
dated August 27, 1951: Kidwai against the Congress
Mr. Rafi Ahmad Kidwai, who had resigned from the Central Cabinet
and later also from the Congress party, outlined in Lucknow what
he said should be the objectives of the Praja Party. Speaking to
Praja workers, he said that the foremost objective was to throw
out the Congress Government which suffered from serious defects
of inefficiency and corruption. Congress governments had brought
about unpopularity not only to the parent organisation, but also
great dissatisfaction to the masses. Mr. Kidwai said, ``in such
circumstances, if Mr. Nehru comes during the election campaign
and asks for a vote for the Central and State governments, it
will be our duty not to act on his advice.
Though the Congress has declared its faith in Mr. Nehru's
leadership, he is not able to get the organisation to work along
the lines he would wish. We will regard Mr. Nehru as our leader,
but that is confined to the high ideals preached by him, and not
in regard to the matter of voting for the present Congress
governments.''
Egypt warns Britain
On the 26th in Cairo, Prime Minister, Nahas Pasha, warned Britain
that unless she made a ``new and constructive move'' before the
end of the Egyptian Parliament session then in progress, talks to
revise the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty would be broken off. Sir Ralph
Stevenson, British Ambassador, was told that if Britain did not
respond soundly to Egypt's national demands, Cairo would formally
terminate the talks, leading to total treaty abrogation.
Parliament was due to take its summer recess in mid-September.
The Egyptians considered the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty of 1936 had
become obsolete and was in dire need of revision. The revision,
or a new treaty, would have to recognise Egypt's complete
independence with withdrawal of foreign forces. The stationing of
British troops in the Suez Canal zone had become a nightmare to
Egyptians.
The authorities contended that if Britain claimed a legal right
under the 1936 treaty to station troops in the canal zone until
1956, that right had been abrogated by numerous treaty
violations.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Miscellaneous Previous : Human birth for enjoying supreme bliss Next : Weather | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|