|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, August 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Govt. climbdown on 'forged' letter
By Javed M. Ansari
NEW DELHI, AUG. 27. A determined Opposition today forced the
Government to climb down from the high moral ground it had sought
to occupy by ordering a CBI inquiry into the alleged ``forged''
letter written by the Cabinet Secretary. The letter was quoted
extensively by the Congress Chief Whip, Mr. Priya Ranjan
Dasmunshi, during the disinvestment debate. Though a final
decision will come in the form of the Speaker's ruling tomorrow,
there were enough indications that the issue would be referred to
the Privileges Committee of Parliament.
The Lok Sabha Speaker, Mr. G. M. C. Balayogi, conferred with
senior leaders Mr. Somnath Chatterjee, Mr. Madhavrao Scindia, the
Parliamentary Affairs Minister, Mr. Pramod Mahajan and Mr.
Dasmunshi. Tomorrow, he will meet some more leaders to find a way
out.
The controversy arose after Mr. Dasmunshi read out the ``letter''
purportedly written by the Cabinet Secretary, Mr. T. R. Prasad,
to the Prime Minister's Principal Secretary disapproving of Air
India disinvestment. The Disinvestment Minister, Mr. Arun
Shourie, challenged the authenticity of the letter and promptly
ordered a CBI inquiry on the floor of the House.
A significant feature of the animated deliberations on the issue
during zero hour was the cohesion and coordination in the
Opposition ranks, as the parties joined hands to force the
Government to resile from the position when it ordered a CBI
inquiry. Mr. Shourie, in contrast, had few backers save his party
spokesman, Mr. V.K. Malhotra. The BJP's allies were conspicuous
by their silence as was the Prime Minister.
The charge levelled against Mr. Shourie by the Opposition leaders
was that he had committed a serious error and inflicted damage on
the dignity of the House by getting an outside agency to inquire
into what had transpired in the House. It was the first time such
a thing had happened. Stoutly resisting the probe, the members
said it would impinge on their privilege as Members of
Parliament.
Though it was Mr. Dasmunshi who brought up the issue, the former
Prime Minister, Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Mr. Somnath Chatterjee and
the former Speaker, Mr. Shivraj Patil, also chipped in with
forceful interventions. Mr. Chandra Shekhar took strong exception
to the ``intemperate language'' used by the Minister on the issue
outside the House.
Mr. Chandra Shekhar defended Mr. Dasmunshi saying he had been
told in confidence by senior PMO officials that the letter was
indeed genuine. He also challenged the Minister's right to order
suo motu a CBI inquiry without the Speaker's permission. The best
forum to inquire into the mater was the privileges committee. The
CPI(M)'s Mr. Somnath Chatterjee supported the demand for
referring the matter to the Privileges Committee. By referring
the issue to the CBI, the Minister had not added to the prestige
of Parliament, he said and urged the members not to treat each
other as criminals. The CBI had made its intentions clear by
declaring within a matter of ten hours that the letter was
forged. ``How can they decide within 10 hours, he asked.''
Mr. Shivraj Patil made a forceful plea for referring the matter
to the Privileges Committee, of which he is a member. He also
declared that he would withdraw from the committee if the matter
came before it. Quoting from Article 105 of the Rules of
Procedure, Mr. Patil said a member was well within his rights to
make a statement in any manner he liked. Mr. Shourie had
committed a breach of privilege by threatening the member with a
CBI inquiry. He was supported by the Bahujan Samaj Party leader,
Ms. Mayawati. Mr. V. K. Malhotra (BJP) said it was Mr. Dasmunshi
who had initially spoken of referring the matter to the CBI and
wondered why he was looking scared now.
Speaking at the fag end of the discussion, Mr. Mahajan indicated
the Government's willingness to review its decision. He left the
final decision to the Speaker's discretion.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : NHRC differs with Govt. on Durban agenda | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|