|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 30, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Moves afoot for 'structured dialogue' at New York
By B. Muralidhar Reddy
ISLAMABAD, AUG. 29. Efforts are on between India and Pakistan for
a structured dialogue between the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari
Vajpayee, and the Pakistan President, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, when
they meet in New York in the last week of September on the
sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly session.
According to sources, informal discussions are on between the two
sides to evolve a ``mutually agreed upon'' structure to carry
forward the process of dialogue in New York. ``We are hopeful of
re-commencing the dialogue on an agreed structure and topics,'' a
senior diplomat said.
The Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, Mr. Vijay K. Nambiar,
is believed to have had a meeting with the Pakistan Foreign
Secretary, Mr. Inam Ul Haq, to discuss the possible agenda for
the New York meeting.
According to a senior official in the Pakistan Office, the
military establishment in Islamabad is not averse to a structured
dialogue. While maintaining that the Musharraf regime has no
difficulty in holding discussions on all subjects, the official
reiterated that in any dialogue, the centrality of Kashmir could
not be ignored.
Indications are that Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) could be
one of the major items of discussion when Gen. Musharraf and Mr.
Vajpayee meet at New York to pick up the threads from Agra.
In the run up to the Agra summit, India had announced a series of
five CBMs and subsequently formally communicated them to
Islamabad. The initial reaction of Pakistan to the announcement
was that CBMs would have to flow from the summit and not precede
it. However in the aftermath of the summit, the military
establishment had made it known that it was examining each of
them on merit.
The CBMs announced by New Delhi included a visit by the Director
General of Military Operations (DGMO) to Islamabad for a
discussion with his Pakistan counterpart on all issues related to
border management and an expert-level dialogue on nuclear-related
issues under the auspices of the External Affairs Ministry.
Scholarships, relaxation of the visa regime and a policy for
early release of fishermen who inadvertently stray into the
waters on the other side were the other CBMs.
While announcing that he might meet Gen. Musharraf at New York,
the Prime Minister had indicated in Lucknow last week that
besides Kashmir, other issues like trade could figure in the
talks.
The very next day, Gen. Musharraf made it a point to raise the
pitch on the Kashmir issue. Addressing the members of the
Pakistan occupied Kashmir Assembly and Council at Muzaffarabad,
Gen. Musharraf had declared that Kashmir would have to be the
focus of any dialogue and normalisation of ties between India and
Pakistan was not possible without resolution of the dispute.
The rhetoric of Gen. Musharraf on the centrality of Kashmir is
being seen as more of a ``domestic compulsion.'' A senior Western
diplomat maintained that if Gen. Musharraf was only interested in
ending the New York talks as in Agra, he would not have formally
written to Mr. Vajpayee seeking a meeting on the sidelines of the
UN session.
Sources said that if the talks progressed well, the two leaders
could reach a ``broad understanding'' on various issues but no
formal agreement is expected at New York.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Rly. fares hiked to set up safety fund Next : Sri Lanka ready for ceasefire with LTTE | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|