|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, August 31, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Complaint lodged against Tehelka staff
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, AUG. 30. A retired Army officer and a programme
officer of Shakti Vahini, a non-governmental organisation, have
lodged a complaint with the Delhi police against Mr. Tarun
Tejpal, Mr. Samuel Mathew, Mr. Aniruddha Bahal and other persons
employed with tehelka.com for procuring women for the ``purpose
of prostitution''.
Seeking action against the named persons under the Indian Penal
Code, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 1956 and the Indecent
Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, the complaint by
Col. (retd.) K.S. Bhimwal of Qutab Institutional Area and Nishi
Shrivastava, programme officer of Shakti Vahini, states that
various articles in the media had made a mention of the use of
sex workers in the Tehelka expose.
The complaint - copies of which have been submitted by the
complainants to the Commissioner of Delhi police, the Deputy
Commissioner of Police (New Delhi district) and the Station House
Officer of Connaught Place police station - says that ``while
purportedly investigating corruption in the Ministry of Defence,
Government of India and the Indian Army, the persons in-charge
and associated with the affairs of M/s tehelka.com procured women
for the purposes of prostitution and provided them to certain
officials of the Indian Army.''
Stating that ``not only did the said persons procure women for
the purposes of prostitution, but also filmed the said officers
committing sexual acts with these women'', the complainants claim
that in the course of various interviews, press conference and
debate shows, Mr. Tarun Tejpal had admitted to having procured
sex workers and making them available to the Army officials.
Of the view that in the course of the Tehelka expose, some
persons involved with the company indulged in various acts of
criminal conspiracy, cheating, impersonation and sedition vis-a-
vis the Government, the complainants sought action against the
named persons.
As for the use of women in the operations, the complainants say,
that by using sex workers and filming them, the named persons
have committed acts which not only denigrated women but were also
grave offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Immoral
Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.
The complainants have also stated that as per newspaper reports,
the wife of Col. Anil Sehgal had complained to the President,
Prime Minister and Defence Minister alleging that her husband who
had been filmed by the tehelka was being blackmailed. The
complaint also alleges production, distribution and circulation
of writings and films which represent women in an indecent
fashion and calls for action under the Indecent Representation of
Women (Prohibition Act), 1986.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Krishan Kant to attend funeral Next : Medha Patkar flays SC notice to Arundhati Roy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|