|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, August 31, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Israel withdraws troops
By Kesava Menon
MANAMA (BAHRAIN), AUG. 30. The Israeli defence forces withdrew
from the Palestinian town of Beit Jala early this morning with
both the Israel Government and the Palestinian Authority claiming
that it had set the terms for the withdrawal.
Ironically, these conflicting claims are not altogether a
negative sign in the current phase of utter turmoil since it
could show that both sides are looking for the ladder by which
they can climb down from their hardline positions. Indeed, from
the manner in which the withdrawal was achieved the Western
diplomats, who pooled their efforts to bring this about, are even
beginning to sound optimistic about the chances of a more
comprehensive cease-fire.
The Israeli tanks and paratroopers who had moved into Beit Jala
two nights ago moved out after a series of conversations over the
telephone between Israel's Foreign Minister, Mr. Shimon Peres,
and the Palestinian Authority President, Mr. Yasser Arafat. (The
Israeli media has reported that Mr. Peres called Mr. Arafat over
10 times). Senior U.S. and European officials are also reported
to have talked to both sides repeatedly. Although Palestinian
gunmen continued to fire at the Israeli troops in Beit Jala till
late in the evening, the fighting did stop at some time and the
Israelis withdrew in the early morning.
Israel says the withdrawal took place after Mr. Peres and Mr.
Arafat reached an unwritten understanding that the withdrawal
would take place if the Palestinians agreed to stop firing
bullets and mortar shells at the Gilo enclave. In the Israeli
version, the Palestinians are said to have given this
understanding. As usual, the picture painted by the Palestinian
side is more confusing and contradictory. While some Palestinian
officials have admitted that the withdrawal took place on the
basis of an unwritten agreement, other officials said it was the
diplomatic pressure combined with the fighting spirit displayed
by the Palestinian gunmen that forced Israel to withdraw.
This second point of view might be self-serving but even if it is
so, it is harmless. Such statements can enable the Palestinians
to claim that they have finally succeeded in obtaining the
international support for which they have been fighting for
throughout the uprising. There are other facts that can also
bolster the Palestinian claim.
According reports, officials of the Palestinian Authority did set
up road blocks outside Beit Jala to prevent their gunmen from
entering the town and fighting with the Israelis.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Govan Mbeki is dead Next : Bush returns from holiday to problems | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|