|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, September 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Next
Revenue staff association heading for split
By Our Special Correspondent
VIJAYAWADA, SEPT. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Revenue Services
Association is heading for a split with direct recruits deciding
to meet in Hyderabad on Tuesday to float a rival organisation for
all revenue employees from attender to tahsildar cadre. Even as
the revenue services association is gearing up its members for a
strike from September 6 to protest against alleged harassment,
the direct recruits said they are determined to call the bluff
and foil the strike.
Speaking to newspersons here today, Mr. T. Sudhakara Prasad,
general secretary of the APNGO Association, who is also secretary
of the AP Revenue Services Association, said the Collector of
Nalgonda District and the Joint Collector of Mahabubnagar
District in particular and all Collectors in general were
victimising revenue employees. The Government should take action
against IAS officials before victimising the subordinate staff
for any misdeed.
Meanwhile, the direct recruits, at a separate press conference,
alleged that the association leaders were using their clout with
the Government to protect the interests of promotee deputy
tahsildars vis-a-vis direct recruits. Though the Supreme Court
had given favourable orders to direct recruits in promotion
matters, the association prevailed on the Government not to
implement the orders causing them irreparable damage, they said.
As the Government promoted senior assistants to deputy tahsildar
cadre for brief periods to get work done relating to elections,
natural calamities, etc, and reverted after the assignment is
over, they were claiming seniority making use of Service Rule 33
(a), which says that 60 days service in a year can be considered
for seniority purposes, leading to an anomalous situation.
Giving an example, they said that a person working as senior
assistant under a direct recruit of 1986 batch gets his promotion
as deputy tahsildar in 1989. But as the promotee had worked as
deputy tahsildar temporarily for a period of two months in 1983
claims seniority and gets promotion as tahsildar and later as
deputy collector surpassing the '86 batch of direct recruits.
As this anomaly had been brought to the notice of the Government
way back in 1980, it issued directions under 4 (e) that promotees
and direct recruits would be taken in 50:50 ratio for promotions
to tahsildar cadre. The promotees challenged this order in the
tribunal and later in the Supreme Court. Though the Supreme Court
upheld 4 (e) and gave orders in favour of direct recruits in
February this year, the association at the behest of promotees
brought pressure on the Chief Minister, Mr. N. Chandrababu Naidu,
to file a revision petition in the Supreme Court.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Next : One killed, 15 injured in group clash | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|