|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, September 04, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
SC to hear Jayalalithaa's petition on Friday
By J. Venkatesan
NEW DELHI, SEPT. 3. The Supreme Court will hear on Friday,
September 7, a petition filed by the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister,
Ms. Jayalalithaa, for vacating the interim stay on the hearing of
her appeals in the Madras High Court, challenging her conviction
in the `TANSI land deal' and `Pleasant Stay Hotel' cases.
A Bench, comprising Mr. Justice S.P. Bharucha and Mr. Justice
Y.K. Sabharwal, posted the petition (which also prayed for the
dismissal of the transfer petition filed by the State prosecutor,
Mr. K.V. Venkatapathi) for hearing on Friday after senior counsel
for Ms. Jayalalithaa, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, mentioned it for early
hearing of the matter.
In her petition filed in response to the notice issued by the
Supreme Court on August 30, Ms. Jayalalithaa assailed the
averment of Mr. Venkatapathi for transfer of the appeals to some
other High Court which said ``in view of the fact that the
appellant is a Chief Minister of the State, and therefore, it
raises serious doubts about the fair and impartial conduct of the
appeal before the High Court''.
`Indictment of judges'
The petitioner also submitted that to say that each of the 36
judges of the Madras High Court would be biased in her favour and
that no impartial judgment would be delivered ``is not only an
indictment of the judges of all the High Courts but also of the
very justice delivery system in the country itself''.
Ms. Jayalalithaa submitted that there were any number of Chief
Ministers who while in office had been indicted by the High Court
judges. A statement of this nature coming from the prosecutor for
transfer of the cases would seriously shake the confidence of the
public in the impartial and independent discharge of functions by
the High Court judges.
She further said that ``there are political overtones in the case
as she won a landslide victory, in the teeth of opposition by the
main ruling party at the Centre and the DMK party at the State
level, at the polls''.
She alleged that ``the combined effort of these political parties
appears to be to drag on the proceedings and delay it as far as
possible so that ultimately she will not even have a chance of
trying to clear her fair name through the judicial process with
the result that on the expiry of six months of her present tenure
(on November 13), instability would be brought about in Tamil
Nadu to the advantage of the main Opposition party''.
Ms. Jayalalithaa pleaded that the facts stated in the petition
filed by Mr. Venkatapathi in which an ex-parte stay was granted
by the court on August 30 had suppressed material facts, were
incorrect and intended to mislead the court.
She said that excerpts of the TV interview (a video cassette of
the interview was also filed in the court) given by Mr.
Venkatapathi on August 27 would show that the High Court judge
had extended to him all facilities for effectively preparing and
addressing arguments.
Ms. Jayalalithaa said if the true facts had been known, the
Supreme Court would not have granted a stay of the trial in the
High Court, where two of the appellants had already completed
their arguments in four of the appeals and the remaining
appellants would only take a few more hours to complete their
arguments.
Constitution Bench to hear PILs
Meanwhile a five-judge Constitution Bench will hear on Tuesday a
batch of Public Interest Litigation petitions challenging her
appointment as Chief Minister by the then Tamil Nadu Governor,
Ms. Fathima Beevi on May 14.
A petition seeking to restrain her from functioning as the Chief
Minister following the Court's recent judgment that convicted
public servants shall not hold public office would also come up
for hearing before the Bench.
A Bench comprising Mr. Justice K.T. Thomas and Mr. Justice S.N.
Variava today adjourned by three weeks a special leave petition
(SLP) filed by the CBI against the order of the Madras High Court
staying the trial of the `SPIC disinvestment case' pending before
a special court in Chennai.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Jagmohan yields to pressure Next : PM calls meet on economic issues today | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|